Player Stats

Caleb Douglas College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,018
Receptions
134
Touchdowns
16

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2022 PostseasonFlorida5225049.3
2022 Regular SeasonFlorida58150249.3
2023 Regular SeasonFlorida411133153.2
2024 PostseasonTexas Tech135115075.3
2024 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1355765675.3
2025 Regular SeasonTexas Tech1353830777

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

Texas Tech paired 830 primary output with 84.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 84.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Florida, Texas Tech.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Houston

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Texas Tech

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

63.8

Efficiency

84.5

Usage

18.6

Consistency

67.2

Best Game by takeover score

Houston

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 44. Kent State: 37. Oregon State: 61. Utah: 68. Houston: 114. Kansas: 55. Arizona State: 19. Oklahoma State: 98. Kansas State: 82. BYU: 12. UCF: 90. West Virginia: 127. BYU: 23

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 3 by 97.8. Kent State: 2 by 100. Oregon State: 1 by 100. Utah: 4 by 100. Houston: 7 by 100. Kansas: 6 by 61.1. Arizona State: 4 by 31.7. Oklahoma State: 5 by 100. Kansas State: 8 by 68.3. BYU: 2 by 40. UCF: 5 by 100. West Virginia: 5 by 100. BYU: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins67.6 · Games = 12 · +48.6 vs Losses
Losses19 · Games = 1 · -48.6 vs Wins