Usage Score
18
Player Dossier
2022-2025Wisconsin
Tommy McIntosh
WR • 6'5" • 210 lbs • Dewitt, MI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tommy McIntosh reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.8
Consistency
34.4
Season Value
55.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Central Michigan
2223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Wisconsin • Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tommy McIntosh, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Central Michigan. Tommy McIntosh reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 422 primary output with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wisconsin, Central Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Central Michigan
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
32.5
Efficiency
69.8
Usage
18
Consistency
34.4
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 21. San José State: 61. Pittsburgh: 17. Michigan: 7. Unknown: 39. Eastern Michigan: 59. Akron: 5. Bowling Green: 9. Massachusetts: 17. Western Michigan: 11. Buffalo: 85. Kent State: 8. Toledo: 83
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 4 by 35. San José State: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 2 by 56.7. Michigan: 1 by 46.7. Unknown: 2 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 100. Akron: 2 by 16.7. Bowling Green: 1 by 60. Massachusetts: 1 by 100. Western Michigan: 1 by 73.3. Buffalo: 5 by 100. Kent State: 2 by 26.7. Toledo: 6 by 92.2
Split Comparison
Wins39.8 · n=6 · +15.8 vs Losses
Losses24 · n=6 · -15.8 vs Wins
First Half29.9 · n=7 · -5.6 vs Second Half
Second Half35.5 · n=6 · +5.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/26 | @ Northwestern | L 7-34 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Toledo | L 3-21 | — | 6 | 83 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 34 |
| Thu 11/20 | @ Kent State | W 28-16 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| Thu 11/13 | vs Buffalo | W 38-19 | — | 5 | 85 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Western Michigan | L 21-24 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Massachusetts | W 38-13 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Bowling Green | W 27-6 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Akron | L 22-28 | — | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 24-13 | — | 2 | 59 | 29.5 | 29.50 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Michigan | L 3-63 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Pittsburgh | L 17-45 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ San José State | W 16-14 | — | 2 | 61 | 30.5 | 30.50 | 0 | 47 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Central Michigan
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 15 | 50 | 10.3 | 15 |
| 2025 Postseason | Central Michigan | 422 | 69.8 | 18 | 407 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 422 | 69.8 | 18 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85
Primary metric
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
83
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#3
San José State
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
59
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Toledo
10
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Central Michigan
422 primary output · 69.8 efficiency · 18 usage
55.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · Central Michigan
55.5
422 primary · 69.8 efficiency · 18 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Central Michigan
34.1
15 primary · 50 efficiency · 10.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.83
Gulf Shores · Gulf Shores, AL
- Committed To
- Troy
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
437
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 15 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.