Usage Score
18.2
Player Dossier
2022-2025Texas Tech
WR • 6'3" • 190 lbs • Apopka, FL, USA
Reginald Virgil reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.2
Efficiency
86.2
Consistency
75.4
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Reginald Virgil, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Miami (OH). Reginald Virgil reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Reginald Virgil played WR for Miami (OH) and Texas Tech. Across 4 tracked seasons, Reginald Virgil recorded 35 rushing yards, 1,583 receiving yards, and 17 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Miami (OH).
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Miami (OH) paired 816 primary output with 90.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Miami (OH), Texas Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
50.4
Efficiency
86.2
Usage
18.2
Consistency
75.4
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 29. Unknown: 56. Kent State: 50. Oregon State: 29. Utah: 72. Houston: 45. Kansas: 34. Arizona State: 50. Oklahoma State: 27. Kansas State: 72. BYU: 54. UCF: 72. West Virginia: 29. BYU: 86
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 2 by 96.7. Unknown: 4 by 93.3. Kent State: 5 by 66.7. Oregon State: 2 by 96.7. Utah: 6 by 80. Houston: 4 by 75. Kansas: 2 by 100. Arizona State: 7 by 47.6. Oklahoma State: 2 by 90. Kansas State: 5 by 96. BYU: 3 by 100. UCF: 5 by 96. West Virginia: 2 by 96.7. BYU: 8 by 71.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
BYU
Best efficiency game
100 vs BYU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | vs Oregon | L 0-23 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 12/6 | vs BYUHigh volume | W 34-7 | — | 8 | 86 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ West Virginia | W 49-0 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs UCF | W 48-9 | — | 5 | 72 | 15.3 | 14.40 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs BYU | W 29-7 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Kansas State | W 43-20 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Oklahoma State | W 42-0 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arizona State | L 22-26 | — | 7 | 50 | 7.1 | 7.10 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Kansas | W 42-17 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Houston | W 35-11 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Utah | W 34-10 | — | 6 | 72 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Oregon State | W 45-14 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kent State2+ TD | W 62-14 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 35 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 56 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 21 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Miami (OH)
2022-2024
Opening stop
Texas Tech
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 28 | 100 | 6.3 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 34 | 100 | 6.7 | 6 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 34 | 100 | 6.7 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 816 | 90.4 | 20 | 782 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas Tech | 705 | 86.2 | 18.2 | -111 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 705 | 86.2 | 18.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113
Primary metric
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Northern Illinois
107
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
BYU
86
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 71.7 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
34
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
816 primary output · 90.4 efficiency · 20 usage
68.8
#2
2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
66.2
705 primary · 86.2 efficiency · 18.2 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Texas Tech
66.2
705 primary · 86.2 efficiency · 18.2 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8259
Mount Dora Christian Academy · Mount Dora, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,583
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.