Player Stats

Robbie Rouse College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
5,441
Rushing yards
4,647
Receiving yards
794
Touchdowns
43

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2009 PostseasonFresno State12880046.4
2009 Regular SeasonFresno State124714710446.4
2010 PostseasonFresno State11463214065.2
2010 Regular SeasonFresno State111,2141,0971171065.2
2011 Regular SeasonFresno State131,7771,5492281480.1
2012 PostseasonFresno State13512229084.8
2012 Regular SeasonFresno State131,8741,4684061584.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Fresno State paired 1,925 primary output with 56 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 56 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Nevada

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Postseason · Fresno State

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

148.1

Efficiency

56

Usage

42.3

Consistency

83.1

Best Game by takeover score

Nevada

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. SMU: 51. Weber State: 145. Oregon: 142. Colorado: 186. Tulsa: 137. San Diego State: 135. Colorado State: 174. Boise State: 145. Wyoming: 112. New Mexico: 153. Hawai'i: 140. Nevada: 268. Air Force: 137

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 18 by 22.4. Weber State: 25 by 59.1. Oregon: 32 by 45.1. Colorado: 13 by 100. Tulsa: 32 by 49.1. San Diego State: 28 by 40.9. Colorado State: 35 by 50.5. Boise State: 34 by 37. Wyoming: 22 by 49.6. New Mexico: 23 by 69.4. Hawai'i: 17 by 83.4. Nevada: 37 by 75.5. Air Force: 29 by 46.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins161.1 · Games = 9 · +42.4 vs Losses
Losses118.8 · Games = 4 · -42.4 vs Wins