Player Stats

Trey Watts College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
4,667
Rushing yards
3,515
Receiving yards
1,152
Touchdowns
28

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonTulsa00000-
2010 PostseasonTulsa1021714037.7
2010 Regular SeasonTulsa10348190158337.7
2011 PostseasonTulsa13503812064.9
2011 Regular SeasonTulsa131,073843230764.9
2012 PostseasonTulsa1316614917073.5
2012 Regular SeasonTulsa131,285959326673.5
2013 Regular SeasonTulsa121,7241,3293951282.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

Tulsa paired 1,724 primary output with 52.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 52.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Regular Season · Tulsa

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

143.7

Efficiency

52.7

Usage

44.4

Consistency

77.6

Best Game by takeover score

Colorado State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: 41. Colorado State: 210. Oklahoma: 125. Iowa State: 107. Rice: 190. UTEP: 147. Tulane: 90. UTSA: 149. East Carolina: 168. Marshall: 171. Louisiana Tech: 212. North Texas: 114

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bowling Green: 9 by 31.5. Colorado State: 30 by 72.3. Oklahoma: 19 by 54.2. Iowa State: 21 by 38.2. Rice: 37 by 51.7. UTEP: 29 by 54. Tulane: 23 by 35.1. UTSA: 20 by 76.5. East Carolina: 31 by 50.4. Marshall: 32 by 56.3. Louisiana Tech: 44 by 49.6. North Texas: 19 by 62.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins189.7 · Games = 3 · +61.3 vs Losses
Losses128.3 · Games = 9 · -61.3 vs Wins