Usage Score
19.8
Player Dossier
2009-2013Tulsa
Jordan James
WR • 6'2" • Norco, LA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jordan James reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.1
Consistency
58.7
Season Value
58.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Tulsa
09101111121213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan James, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Tulsa. Jordan James reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 471 primary output with 74.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
42.8
Efficiency
74.1
Usage
19.8
Consistency
58.7
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: 58. Colorado State: 40. Oklahoma: 100. Iowa State: 86. Rice: 12. Tulane: 27. UTSA: 50. East Carolina: 17. Marshall: 37. Louisiana Tech: 34. North Texas: 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. Colorado State: 3 by 88.9. Oklahoma: 6 by 100. Iowa State: 8 by 71.7. Rice: 1 by 80. Tulane: 3 by 60. UTSA: 5 by 66.7. East Carolina: 2 by 56.7. Marshall: 3 by 82.2. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 75.6. North Texas: 2 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Wins37 · n=2 · -7.1 vs Losses
Losses44.1 · n=9 · +7.1 vs Wins
First Half53.8 · n=6 · +24.2 vs Second Half
Second Half29.6 · n=5 · -24.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs North Texas | L 10-42 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 24-14 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Fri 11/15 | vs Marshall | L 34-45 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ East Carolina | L 24-58 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs UTSA | L 15-34 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Tulane | L 7-14 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Rice | L 27-30 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 9/26 | vs Iowa StateHigh volume | L 21-38 | — | 8 | 86 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Oklahoma100 receiving yards | L 20-51 | — | 6 | 100 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Colorado State | W 30-27 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Thu 8/29 | @ Bowling Green | L 7-34 | — | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 0 | 37 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112011201220122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulsa | 27 | 100 | 3.6 | 27 |
| 2011 Postseason | Tulsa | 391 | 60.7 | 14.7 | 364 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulsa | 391 | 60.7 | 14.7 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Tulsa | 568 | 72.5 | 16.1 | 177 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulsa | 568 | 72.5 | 16.1 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulsa | 471 | 74.1 | 19.8 | -97 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
100
Primary metric
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
145
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
145 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UAB
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UCF
74
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#5
Rice
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Tulsa
471 primary output · 74.1 efficiency · 19.8 usage
58.9
#2
2012 Postseason · Tulsa
58.6
568 primary · 72.5 efficiency · 16.1 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Tulsa
58.6
568 primary · 72.5 efficiency · 16.1 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8322
St. Thomas More · Lafayette, LA
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,457
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.