Usage Score
18.7
Player Dossier
2009-2012UAB
Patrick Hearn
WR • 6'1" • Quitman, MS, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Patrick Hearn reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.1
Consistency
42.9
Season Value
59.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · UAB
09101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UAB
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Patrick Hearn, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · UAB. Patrick Hearn reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
UAB paired 536 primary output with 82.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · UAB
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
62.8
Efficiency
78.1
Usage
18.7
Consistency
42.9
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 108. South Carolina: 66. Ohio State: 40. Tulsa: 27. East Carolina: 5. Tulane: 36. Southern Miss: 54. Marshall: 47. Memphis: 44. UCF: 201
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 7 by 100. South Carolina: 4 by 100. Ohio State: 4 by 66.7. Tulsa: 5 by 36. East Carolina: 1 by 33.3. Tulane: 2 by 100. Southern Miss: 5 by 72. Marshall: 2 by 100. Memphis: 4 by 73.3. UCF: 8 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins50.5 · n=2 · -15.4 vs Losses
Losses65.9 · n=8 · +15.4 vs Wins
First Half49.2 · n=5 · -27.2 vs Second Half
Second Half76.4 · n=5 · +27.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCF
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCF
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ UCF100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-49 | — | 8 | 201 | 25.1 | 25.10 | 1 | 76 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Memphis | L 9-46 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Marshall | W 38-31 | — | 2 | 47 | 23.5 | 23.50 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Southern Miss | W 27-19 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Tulane | L 45-55 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs East Carolina | L 35-42 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Tulsa | L 42-49 | — | 5 | 27 | 5.4 | 5.40 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Ohio State | L 15-29 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ South Carolina | L 6-49 | — | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Troy100 receiving yards | L 29-39 | — | 7 | 108 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 0 | 28 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | UAB | 23 | 50 | 10.9 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | UAB | 536 | 82.6 | 15.1 | 513 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UAB | 364 | 68.4 | 14.4 | -172 |
| 2012 Regular Season | UAB | 628 | 78.1 | 18.7 | 264 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCF
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
201
Primary metric
201 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Southern Miss
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UCF
23
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · UAB
536 primary output · 82.6 efficiency · 15.1 usage
61
#2
2012 Regular Season · UAB
59.8
628 primary · 78.1 efficiency · 18.7 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · UAB
50.8
364 primary · 68.4 efficiency · 14.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7667
Quitman · Quitman, MS
- Committed To
- UAB
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,551
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.