Usage Score
10.1
Player Dossier
2009-2012Miami (OH)
Luke Swift
WR • 6'2" • Greenwood, IN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Luke Swift reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.1
Consistency
56.4
Season Value
59.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
09101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Miami (OH)
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Luke Swift, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Miami (OH). Luke Swift reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Miami (OH) paired 307 primary output with 75.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
34.1
Efficiency
75.1
Usage
10.1
Consistency
56.4
Best Game by takeover score
Ball State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boise State: 8. Akron: 52. Cincinnati: 67. Bowling Green: 29. Ohio: 14. Buffalo: 9. Kent State: 71. Central Michigan: 48. Ball State: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boise State: 1 by 53.3. Akron: 3 by 100. Cincinnati: 5 by 89.3. Bowling Green: 2 by 96.7. Ohio: 1 by 93.3. Buffalo: 1 by 60. Kent State: 4 by 100. Central Michigan: 6 by 53.3. Ball State: 2 by 30
Split Comparison
Wins33 · n=2 · -1.4 vs Losses
Losses34.4 · n=7 · +1.4 vs Wins
First Half34 · n=5 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half34.3 · n=4 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs Ball State | L 24-31 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.7 | 4.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Central Michigan | L 16-30 | — | 6 | 48 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Kent State | L 32-48 | — | 4 | 71 | 14.2 | 17.80 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Buffalo | L 24-27 | — | 1 | 9 | 6.5 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Ohio | W 23-20 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Bowling Green | L 12-37 | — | 2 | 29 | 8 | 14.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Cincinnati | L 14-52 | — | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Akron | W 56-49 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Boise State | L 12-39 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Miami (OH)
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 153 | 64.3 | 7.3 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 13 | 43.3 | 7.1 | -140 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 0 | — | — | -13 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 307 | 75.1 | 10.1 | 307 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71
Primary metric
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Temple
45
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Cincinnati
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 89.3 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
52
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Toledo
26
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
307 primary output · 75.1 efficiency · 10.1 usage
59.9
#2
2009 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
42.1
153 primary · 64.3 efficiency · 7.3 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
38.6
13 primary · 43.3 efficiency · 7.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7889
Center Grove · Greenwood, IN
- Committed To
- Miami (OH)
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
473
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.