Player Stats

Aaron Dobson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,398
Receptions
165
Touchdowns
24

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonMarshall515362470.3
2010 Regular SeasonMarshall1144689579.3
2011 PostseasonMarshall13781275.5
2011 Regular SeasonMarshall13425871075.5
2012 Regular SeasonMarshall1057679376.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season

Marshall paired 689 primary output with 79.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2012 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 78.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2012 Regular Season · Marshall

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

67.9

Efficiency

78.5

Usage

15.9

Consistency

77.9

Best Game by takeover score

Tulsa

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 72. Western Carolina: 81. Ohio: 94. Rice: 66. Purdue: 42. Tulsa: 128. Southern Miss: 63. UCF: 68. Memphis: 4. East Carolina: 61

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 4 by 100. Western Carolina: 9 by 60. Ohio: 11 by 57. Rice: 5 by 88. Purdue: 3 by 93.3. Tulsa: 10 by 85.3. Southern Miss: 5 by 84. UCF: 5 by 90.7. Memphis: 1 by 26.7. East Carolina: 4 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins53.5 · Games = 4 · -24 vs Losses
Losses77.5 · Games = 6 · +24 vs Wins