Usage Score
12.8
Player Dossier
2022-2025Virginia Tech
Dae'Quan Wright
TE • 6'4" • 255 lbs • Perry, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Dae'Quan Wright reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.4
Consistency
64.2
Season Value
64.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Ole Miss
222324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Virginia Tech • Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dae'Quan Wright, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Ole Miss. Dae'Quan Wright reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Ole Miss paired 635 primary output with 81.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Virginia Tech, Ole Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Ole Miss
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
45.4
Efficiency
81.4
Usage
12.8
Consistency
64.2
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 64. Georgia: 18. Tulane: 64. Georgia State: 78. Arkansas: 64. Tulane: 71. LSU: 66. Washington State: 80. Georgia: 34. Oklahoma: 11. South Carolina: 32. Unknown: 13. Florida: 36. Mississippi State: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 3 by 100. Georgia: 2 by 60. Tulane: 4 by 100. Georgia State: 4 by 100. Arkansas: 1 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 100. LSU: 4 by 100. Washington State: 4 by 100. Georgia: 3 by 75.6. Oklahoma: 3 by 24.4. South Carolina: 2 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 86.7. Florida: 3 by 80. Mississippi State: 2 by 13.3
Split Comparison
Wins47.6 · n=11 · -1.4 vs Losses
Losses49 · n=2 · +1.4 vs Wins
First Half60.7 · n=7 · +30.7 vs Second Half
Second Half30 · n=7 · -30.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/9 | vs Miami | L 27-31 | — | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 1 | 24 |
| Fri 1/2 | @ Georgia | W 39-34 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 12/20 | vs Tulane | W 41-10 | — | 4 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 25 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Mississippi State | W 38-19 | — | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs Florida | W 34-24 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs South Carolina | W 30-14 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Oklahoma | W 34-26 | — | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Georgia | L 35-43 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Washington State | W 24-21 | — | 4 | 80 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs LSU | W 24-19 | — | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Tulane | W 45-10 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Arkansas | W 41-35 | — | 1 | 64 | 64 | 64 | 0 | 64 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Georgia State | W 63-7 | — | 4 | 78 | 16 | 19.50 | 1 | 38 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Virginia Tech
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Ole Miss
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 208 | 70.6 | 17.6 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 366 | 69.9 | 16.2 | 158 |
| 2024 Postseason | Ole Miss | 361 | 83.1 | 11.9 | -5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 361 | 83.1 | 11.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Ole Miss | 635 | 81.4 | 12.8 | 274 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 635 | 81.4 | 12.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77
Primary metric
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Washington State
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
NC State
46
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia State
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Virginia
64
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Ole Miss
635 primary output · 81.4 efficiency · 12.8 usage
64.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · Ole Miss
64.6
635 primary · 81.4 efficiency · 12.8 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Virginia Tech
54.3
366 primary · 69.9 efficiency · 16.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8756
Perry · Perry, GA
- Committed To
- Virginia Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,570
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 41 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.