Player Stats

Jordan Mcdonald College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,003
Rushing yards
857
Receiving yards
146
Touchdowns
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonUCF343430115.3
2023 Regular SeasonUCF4895633331.1
2024 PostseasonBoston College64-15164.8
2024 Regular SeasonBoston College638636224264.8
2025 Regular SeasonBoston College1248139784660.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

Boston College paired 390 primary output with 61.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 41.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UCF, Boston College.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UConn

Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Boston College

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

40.1

Efficiency

41.6

Usage

15.7

Consistency

56.2

Best Game by takeover score

UConn

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Fordham: 33. Michigan State: 17. Stanford: 26. California: 8. Pittsburgh: 42. Clemson: 33. UConn: 123. Louisville: 88. Notre Dame: 4. SMU: 40. Georgia Tech: 34. Syracuse: 33

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fordham: 8 by 38. Michigan State: 6 by 26.8. Stanford: 6 by 39.9. California: 3 by 23.6. Pittsburgh: 6 by 67.9. Clemson: 5 by 54.1. UConn: 24 by 53.4. Louisville: 21 by 43.8. Notre Dame: 3 by 13.9. SMU: 10 by 40.1. Georgia Tech: 9 by 39.4. Syracuse: 6 by 57.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins33 · Games = 2 · -8.5 vs Losses
Losses41.5 · Games = 10 · +8.5 vs Wins