Usage Score
7.2
Player Dossier
2022-2025Missouri State
S • 6'1" • 200 lbs • Zephyrhills, FL, USA
Maguire Neal shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.6 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.2
Efficiency
25.6
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
14.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Missouri State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Maguire Neal, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Missouri State. Maguire Neal shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.6 disruption score.
Maguire Neal played S for Charlotte and Missouri State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Maguire Neal recorded 100 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Missouri State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Missouri State paired 7 primary output with 25.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 25.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Charlotte, Missouri State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
25.6
Usage
7.2
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 0. USC: 0. Marshall: 0. SMU: 1. Unknown: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0. New Mexico State: 2. Florida International: 1. Liberty: 1. UTEP: 0. Kennesaw State: 0. Louisiana Tech: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 4 by 16.7. USC: 9 by 37.5. Marshall: 3 by 12.5. SMU: 5 by 30.8. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Western Kentucky: 8 by 33.3. Middle Tennessee: 7 by 29.2. New Mexico State: 3 by 32.5. Florida International: 4 by 26.7. Liberty: 5 by 30.8. UTEP: 3 by 12.5. Kennesaw State: 4 by 16.7. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 45
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
45 vs Louisiana Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/19 | @ Arkansas State | L 28-34 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 30-42 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Kennesaw State | L 34-41 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs UTEP | W 38-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Liberty | W 21-17 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 10/30 | vs Florida International | W 28-21 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 10/23 | @ New Mexico State | W 24-17 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Wed 10/8 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 22-20 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Western Kentucky | L 22-27 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs SMU | L 10-28 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Marshall | W 21-20 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ USC | L 13-73 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Charlotte
2022-2024
Opening stop
Missouri State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Charlotte | 2 | 11.6 | 3.4 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Charlotte | 2.5 | 11.1 | 3.1 | 0.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Charlotte | 1 | 12.2 | 1.8 | -1.5 |
| 2025 Postseason | Missouri State | 7 | 25.6 | 7.2 | 6 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Missouri State | 7 | 25.6 | 7.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
North Carolina
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 58.1 takeover score.
#3
New Mexico State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
#4
South Carolina
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.1 takeover score.
#5
SMU
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Missouri State
7 primary output · 25.6 efficiency · 7.2 usage
14.3
#2
2025 Regular Season · Missouri State
14.3
7 primary · 25.6 efficiency · 7.2 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Charlotte
13.8
2.5 primary · 11.1 efficiency · 3.1 usage
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.833
Zephyrhills · Zephyrhills, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
100
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 32 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.