Usage Score
15.9
Player Dossier
2009-2013Vanderbilt
Wesley Tate
RB • 6'1" • Hendersonville, TN, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Wesley Tate leans balanced backfield option traits and 39.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
39.5
Consistency
57.1
Season Value
51.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Vanderbilt
0910111112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Vanderbilt
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Wesley Tate, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Vanderbilt. Wesley Tate leans balanced backfield option traits and 39.5 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Vanderbilt paired 492 primary output with 37.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 39.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Loss with 90 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Vanderbilt
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
42
Efficiency
39.5
Usage
15.9
Consistency
57.1
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 2. Ole Miss: 52. Unknown: 17. South Carolina: 90. Massachusetts: 90. UAB: 71. Missouri: 84. Georgia: 17. Texas A&M: 3. Florida: 0. Tennessee: 44. Wake Forest: 34
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 3 by 6.9. Ole Miss: 20 by 25.2. Unknown: 5 by 35.4. South Carolina: 11 by 78.5. Massachusetts: 15 by 53.6. UAB: 10 by 66.4. Missouri: 13 by 51. Georgia: 5 by 29.8. Texas A&M: 3 by 10.4. Tennessee: 13 by 41.4. Wake Forest: 10 by 35.4
Split Comparison
Wins36.9 · n=7 · -20.4 vs Losses
Losses57.3 · n=4 · +20.4 vs Wins
First Half53.7 · n=6 · +23.3 vs Second Half
Second Half30.3 · n=6 · -23.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
78.5 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/4 | @ Houston | W 41-24 | 3 | 2 | 0.70 | 0 | — | — | 0.7 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Wake Forest | W 23-21 | 10 | 34 | 3.40 | 0 | — | — | 3.4 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Tennessee | W 14-10 | 8 | 35 | 4.40 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 3.4 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Florida | W 34-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Texas A&M | L 24-56 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Georgia | W 31-27 | 4 | 10 | 2.50 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3.4 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Missouri | L 28-51 | 7 | 27 | 3.90 | 1 | 6 | 57 | 6.5 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs UAB | W 52-24 | 9 | 53 | 5.90 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 7.1 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Massachusetts | W 24-7 | 14 | 64 | 4.60 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 6 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ South Carolina | L 25-35 | 10 | 71 | 7.10 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 8.2 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 17 | 3.40 | 0 | — | — | 3.4 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Ole Miss2+ TD | L 35-39 | 17 | 39 | 2.30 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 2.6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Vanderbilt
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 165 | 27.3 | 8.6 | 165 |
| 2011 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 213 | 55.5 | 4.2 | 48 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 213 | 55.5 | 4.2 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 492 | 37.7 | 17.9 | 279 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 492 | 37.7 | 17.9 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Vanderbilt | 504 | 39.5 | 15.9 | 12 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Vanderbilt | 504 | 39.5 | 15.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Alabama
Loss with 46 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
46
Primary metric
46 scrimmage yards and 9.1 usage.
#2
South Carolina
90
Primary metric
Loss with 90 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
90 scrimmage yards and 24.4 usage.
#3
Army
38
Primary metric
Win with 38 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
38 scrimmage yards and 4.7 usage.
#4
Wake Forest
64
Primary metric
Win with 64 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
64 scrimmage yards and 8 usage.
#5
Massachusetts
81
Primary metric
Win with 81 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
81 scrimmage yards and 29.4 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Vanderbilt
492 primary output · 37.7 efficiency · 17.9 usage
53.6
#2
2012 Regular Season · Vanderbilt
53.6
492 primary · 37.7 efficiency · 17.9 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Vanderbilt
51.9
504 primary · 39.5 efficiency · 15.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.84
Pope John Paul II · Hendersonville, TN
- Committed To
- Vanderbilt
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,374
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.