Usage Score
15.8
Player Dossier
2009-2012Notre Dame
WR • 5'9" • Laie, HI, USA
Robby Toma reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
15.8
Efficiency
67.2
Consistency
63.1
Season Value
58.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Robby Toma, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Robby Toma reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Robby Toma played WR for Notre Dame. Across 4 tracked seasons, Robby Toma recorded 40 rushing yards, 667 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Notre Dame.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 252 primary output with 67.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
28
Efficiency
67.2
Usage
15.8
Consistency
63.1
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Navy: 0. Purdue: 33. Michigan State: 58. Miami: 22. Stanford: 5. Oklahoma: 13. Pittsburgh: 50. Wake Forest: 37. USC: 34
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 4 by 55. Michigan State: 5 by 77.3. Miami: 2 by 73.3. Stanford: 1 by 33.3. Oklahoma: 2 by 43.3. Pittsburgh: 6 by 55.6. Wake Forest: 2 by 100. USC: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
100 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | @ USC | W 22-13 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Wake Forest | W 38-0 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Pittsburgh | W 29-26 | — | 6 | 50 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 10/28 | @ Oklahoma | W 30-13 | — | 2 | 13 | 6 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Stanford | W 20-13 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Miami | W 41-3 | — | 2 | 22 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/16 | @ Michigan State | W 20-3 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Purdue | W 20-17 | — | 4 | 33 | 7.8 | 8.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Navy | W 50-10 | — | — | — | 9 | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 21 | 48.3 | 6 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 187 | 73.9 | 12.3 | 166 |
| 2011 Postseason | Notre Dame | 207 | 73.3 | 12.8 | 20 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 207 | 73.3 | 12.8 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 252 | 67.2 | 15.8 | 45 |
#1 Featured game
Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
63
Primary metric
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Michigan State
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Boston College
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Maryland
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 69.5 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Notre Dame
252 primary output · 67.2 efficiency · 15.8 usage
58.9
#2
2010 Regular Season · Notre Dame
49.5
187 primary · 73.9 efficiency · 12.3 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Notre Dame
48.7
207 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 12.8 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8267
Punahou · Honolulu, HI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
667
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.