Usage Score
24.7
Player Dossier
2009-2012Notre Dame
Tyler Eifert
TE • 6'6" • Ft. Wayne, IN, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Tyler Eifert reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.2
Consistency
75.3
Season Value
69.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Notre Dame
09101011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Eifert, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Notre Dame. Tyler Eifert reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 803 primary output with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
57.1
Efficiency
82.2
Usage
24.7
Consistency
75.3
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 61. Navy: 22. Purdue: 98. Michigan: 38. Miami: 31. Stanford: 57. BYU: 73. Oklahoma: 22. Pittsburgh: 62. Boston College: 67. Wake Forest: 85. USC: 69
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 6 by 67.8. Navy: 4 by 36.7. Purdue: 4 by 100. Michigan: 1 by 100. Miami: 2 by 100. Stanford: 4 by 95. BYU: 4 by 100. Oklahoma: 3 by 48.9. Pittsburgh: 6 by 68.9. Boston College: 6 by 74.4. Wake Forest: 6 by 94.4. USC: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins56.7 · n=11
First Half51.2 · n=6 · -11.8 vs Second Half
Second Half63 · n=6 · +11.8 vs First Half
All Games57.1 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
BYU
Best efficiency game
100 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/8 | @ Alabama | L 14-42 | — | 6 | 61 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/25 | @ USC | W 22-13 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Wake Forest | W 38-0 | — | 6 | 85 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 1 | 38 |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Boston College | W 21-6 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Pittsburgh | W 29-26 | — | 6 | 62 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 10/28 | @ Oklahoma | W 30-13 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs BYU | W 17-14 | — | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Stanford | W 20-13 | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Miami | W 41-3 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Michigan | W 13-6 | — | 1 | 38 | 38 | 38 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Purdue | W 20-17 | — | 4 | 98 | 24.5 | 24.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Navy | W 50-10 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 1 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Notre Dame | 352 | 79.1 | 18 | 352 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 352 | 79.1 | 18 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Notre Dame | 803 | 84.1 | 20.5 | 451 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 803 | 84.1 | 20.5 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Notre Dame | 685 | 82.2 | 24.7 | -118 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 685 | 82.2 | 24.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78
Primary metric
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida State
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
BYU
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
South Florida
93
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Purdue
98
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Notre Dame
803 primary output · 84.1 efficiency · 20.5 usage
70.4
#2
2011 Regular Season · Notre Dame
70.4
803 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 20.5 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Notre Dame
69.4
685 primary · 82.2 efficiency · 24.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.7
Central · Traverse City, MI
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,840
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.