Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2022-2025Texas Tech
LB • 6'3" • 235 lbs • Haslet, TX, USA
Ben Roberts shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.1 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.4
Efficiency
36.1
Consistency
48.2
Season Value
47.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ben Roberts, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Texas Tech. Ben Roberts shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.1 disruption score.
Ben Roberts played LB for Texas Tech. Across 4 tracked seasons, Ben Roberts recorded 272 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Texas Tech.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas Tech paired 16 primary output with 36.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 36.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
36.1
Usage
7.4
Consistency
48.2
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 2. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 0. Kent State: 0. Oregon State: 4. Utah: 1. Houston: 0. Kansas: 1. Arizona State: 2. Oklahoma State: 0. Kansas State: 2. BYU: 0. UCF: 1. West Virginia: 0. BYU: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 16 by 70. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 4 by 16.7. Kent State: 6 by 25. Oregon State: 3 by 52.5. Utah: 6 by 35. Houston: 6 by 25. Kansas: 6 by 35. Arizona State: 13 by 70. Oklahoma State: 5 by 20.8. Kansas State: 3 by 32.5. BYU: 6 by 25. UCF: 5 by 30.8. West Virginia: 4 by 16.7. BYU: 5 by 50.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oregon State
Best efficiency game
70 vs Oregon
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | vs Oregon10+ tackles · Splash game | L 0-23 | 16 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/6 | vs BYUSplash game | W 34-7 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ West Virginia | W 49-0 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs UCF | W 48-9 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs BYU | W 29-7 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Kansas StateSplash game | W 43-20 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Oklahoma State | W 42-0 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arizona State10+ tackles · Splash game | L 22-26 | 13 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Kansas | W 42-17 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Houston | W 35-11 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Utah | W 34-10 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Oregon StateSplash game | W 45-14 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kent State | W 62-14 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff | W 67-7 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas Tech
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Texas Tech | 12 | 42.6 | 11 | 12 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 12 | 42.6 | 11 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas Tech | 9.5 | 35.4 | 8.9 | -2.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 9.5 | 35.4 | 8.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas Tech | 16 | 36.1 | 7.4 | 6.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 16 | 36.1 | 7.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Oregon
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 69.9 takeover score.
#2
Cincinnati
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 67.6 takeover score.
#3
Oregon State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 53.2 takeover score.
#4
Iowa State
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.8 takeover score.
#5
California
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
16 primary output · 36.1 efficiency · 7.4 usage
47.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas Tech
47.9
16 primary · 36.1 efficiency · 7.4 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Texas Tech
40.5
12 primary · 42.6 efficiency · 11 usage
2
Impact games
10
Splash games
10
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8541
Eaton · Haslet, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
272
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.