Player Stats

Brayden Fowler-Nicolosi College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
6,949
Passing yards
6,897
Rushing yards
52
Touchdowns
45

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2022 Regular SeasonColorado State22001946140.9
2023 Regular SeasonColorado State123,4293,460-312364.7
2024 PostseasonColorado State133213210160.9
2024 Regular SeasonColorado State132,5142,434801860.9
2025 Regular SeasonColorado State3485488-3248

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Colorado State paired 3,429 primary output with 56.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 52.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Loss with 157 yards of offense and 53.7 efficiency. It landed in the 66.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Colorado State

Games

3

Primary Metric / G

161.7

Efficiency

52.2

Usage

12.7

Consistency

97.2

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Washington: 174. Northern Colorado: 154. UTSA: 157

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 35 by 46.9. Northern Colorado: 30 by 56. UTSA: 31 by 53.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins154 · Games = 1 · -11.5 vs Losses
Losses165.5 · Games = 2 · +11.5 vs Wins