Usage Score
5.8
Player Dossier
2009-2013Tulane
Wilson Van Hooser
WR • 6'0" • Montgomery, AL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Wilson Van Hooser reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70
Consistency
44.1
Season Value
39.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Tulane
0910111213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Tulane • Troy
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Wilson Van Hooser, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Tulane. Wilson Van Hooser reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Tulane paired 487 primary output with 78.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tulane, Troy.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Troy
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
18.8
Efficiency
70
Usage
5.8
Consistency
44.1
Best Game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 21. Arkansas State: 20. Mississippi State: 11. Duke: 49. South Alabama: 0. Georgia State: 3. Western Kentucky: 3. UL Monroe: 61. Louisiana: 20. Ole Miss: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 3 by 46.7. Arkansas State: 1 by 100. Mississippi State: 1 by 73.3. Duke: 2 by 100. Georgia State: 1 by 20. Western Kentucky: 1 by 20. UL Monroe: 3 by 100. Louisiana: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins6.8 · n=4 · -20.1 vs Losses
Losses26.8 · n=6 · +20.1 vs Wins
First Half20.2 · n=5 · +2.8 vs Second Half
Second Half17.4 · n=5 · -2.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Best efficiency game
100 vs Louisiana
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/16 | @ Ole Miss | L 21-51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/8 | @ Louisiana | L 36-41 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Thu 10/31 | vs UL Monroe | L 37-49 | — | 3 | 61 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Western Kentucky | W 32-26 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Georgia State | W 35-28 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs South Alabama | W 34-33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Duke | L 31-38 | — | 2 | 49 | 24.5 | 24.50 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Mississippi State | L 7-62 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 9/12 | @ Arkansas State | L 34-41 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs UAB | W 34-31 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2009-2012
Opening stop
- 2
Troy
2013
Final stop
Season Progression
20092010201120122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulane | 85 | 66.7 | 4.8 | 85 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulane | 487 | 78.2 | 14.5 | 402 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulane | 233 | 86.7 | 6.1 | -254 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Troy | 188 | 70 | 5.8 | -45 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
100
Primary metric
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UL Monroe
61
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rice
68
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Marshall
30
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Houston
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Tulane
487 primary output · 78.2 efficiency · 14.5 usage
60.6
#2
2012 Regular Season · Tulane
51.3
233 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 6.1 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Troy
39.7
188 primary · 70 efficiency · 5.8 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.78
Trinity Presbyterian School · Montgomery, AL
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
993
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.