Usage / Role
23%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2010Tulane
RB • 5'11" • Waggaman, LA, USA
Payten Jason leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.1 efficiency.
Usage / Role
23%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
28
Developing production for a back
Reliability
18
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
38
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Tulane
Snapshot
Player Story
Payten Jason built his college career from 2009 through 2010 as a running back from Waggaman, LA wearing No. 28, spending time with Tulane. The clearest part of Payten Jason's career was his backfield work: 309...
Read the storyPayten Jason, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Tulane. Payten Jason leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.1 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulane | 5 | 121 | 85 | 36 | 0 | 36.2 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulane | 9 | 296 | 224 | 72 | 2 | 64.1 |
Related Context
Payten Jason played RB for Tulane. Across 2 tracked seasons, Payten Jason recorded 309 rushing yards, 108 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Tulane.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Tulane paired 296 primary output with 45.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 45.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Loss with 60 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Scrimmage Yards / G
32.9
Efficiency
45.1
Usage
14.6
Consistency
69.3
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 20. Houston: 30. Rutgers: 35. Army: 49. Tulsa: 29. SMU: 60. Southern Miss: 16. Rice: 50. Marshall: 7
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 8 by 22.9. Houston: 6 by 52.1. Rutgers: 16 by 20.8. Army: 11 by 42.3. Tulsa: 6 by 50.3. SMU: 14 by 44.6. Southern Miss: 4 by 41.7. Rice: 4 by 72.9. Marshall: 1 by 58.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
72.9 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | @ Marshall | L 23-38 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Rice | W 54-49 | 3 | 11 | 3.70 | 0 | 1 | 39 | 12.5 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Southern Miss | L 30-46 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs SMU | L 17-31 | 14 | 60 | 4.30 | 0 | — | — | 4.3 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Tulsa | L 24-52 | 6 | 29 | 4.80 | 0 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Army | L 23-41 | 10 | 38 | 3.80 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 4.5 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Rutgers | W 17-14 | 15 | 28 | 1.90 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2.2 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Houston | L 23-42 | 6 | 30 | 5 | 1 | — | — | 5 |
| Sun 9/12 | vs Ole Miss | L 13-27 | 6 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 2.5 |
Player Story
Payten Jason built his college career from 2009 through 2010 as a running back from Waggaman, LA wearing No. 28, spending time with Tulane. The clearest part of Payten Jason's career was his backfield work: 309 rushing yards, 83 carries, 2 rushing touchdowns, and 108 receiving yards across 14 career games in the available record. His career also includes 108 receiving yards and 158 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Payten Jason's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulane
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulane | 121 | 46.4 | 9.7 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulane | 296 | 45.1 | 14.6 | 175 |
#1 Featured game
vs Marshall
Week 6 · L 10-31 · Conference game
Loss with 73 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
73
Scrimmage Yards
72.7 takeover
73 scrimmage yards and 22.6 usage.
#2
vs SMU
Week 9 · L 17-31 · Conference game
60
Scrimmage Yards
69.1 takeover
Loss with 60 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
60 scrimmage yards and 21.9 usage.
#3
vs Army
Week 6 · L 23-41
49
Scrimmage Yards
64.1 takeover
Loss with 49 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
49 scrimmage yards and 23.9 usage.
#4
@ Rutgers
Week 5 · W 17-14
35
Scrimmage Yards
59.5 takeover
Win with 35 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
35 scrimmage yards and 34.8 usage.
#5
vs Rice
Week 11 · W 54-49 · Conference game
50
Scrimmage Yards
58.4 takeover
Win with 50 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
50 scrimmage yards and 6.6 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Regular Season · Tulane
296 primary output · 45.1 efficiency · 14.6 usage
64.1
#2
2009 Regular Season · Tulane
36.2
121 primary · 46.4 efficiency · 9.7 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.