Usage Score
16.3
Player Dossier
2022-2025Tulsa
Zion Steptoe
WR • 5'11" • 195 lbs • Little Elm, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Zion Steptoe reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.4
Consistency
55.1
Season Value
56.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Purdue
22232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Purdue • Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Zion Steptoe, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Purdue. Zion Steptoe reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Zion Steptoe played WR for Purdue and Tulsa. Across 4 tracked seasons, Zion Steptoe recorded 65 rushing yards, 475 receiving yards, and 13 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Tulsa.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Purdue paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Purdue, Tulsa.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
30.2
Efficiency
73.4
Usage
16.3
Consistency
55.1
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Navy: 3. Oklahoma State: 26. Tulane: 26. Memphis: 25. East Carolina: 57. Temple: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. Army: 76. UAB: 59
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 1 by 20. Oklahoma State: 3 by 57.8. Tulane: 3 by 57.8. Memphis: 2 by 83.3. East Carolina: 4 by 95. Army: 5 by 100. UAB: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins51 · Games = 2 · +26.7 vs Losses
Losses24.3 · Games = 7 · -26.7 vs Wins
First Half27.4 · Games = 5 · -6.4 vs Second Half
Second Half33.8 · Games = 4 · +6.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
100 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs UAB | L 24-31 | — | 3 | 59 | 14.4 | 19.70 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Army | W 26-25 | — | 5 | 76 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 21-40 | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Temple | L 37-38 | — | — | — | 5.7 | — | — | — |
| Thu 10/16 | @ East Carolina | L 27-41 | — | 4 | 57 | 17.8 | 14.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 10/5 | @ Memphis | L 7-45 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Tulane | L 14-31 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Fri 9/19 | @ Oklahoma State | W 19-12 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Navy | L 23-42 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Tulsa
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2022202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Tulsa | 203 | 70 | 10.4 | 203 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Tulsa | 272 | 73.4 | 16.3 | 69 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76
Primary metric
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
88
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UAB
59
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
East Carolina
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
#5
East Carolina
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Purdue
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2025 Regular Season · Tulsa
56.3
272 primary · 73.4 efficiency · 16.3 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Tulsa
45.5
203 primary · 70 efficiency · 10.4 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.83
Laurel · Laurel, MS
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
475
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 22 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.