Usage Score
30.1
Player Dossier
2009-2012Army
QB • 6'0" • Bowling Green, KY, USA
Trent Steelman is a dual-threat creator with 30.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
30.1
Efficiency
62.9
Consistency
82.8
Season Value
68.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trent Steelman, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Army. Trent Steelman is a dual-threat creator with 30.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Trent Steelman played QB for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Trent Steelman recorded 2,723 passing yards, 3,320 rushing yards, and 5 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Army paired 1,915 primary output with 62.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 62.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
159.6
Efficiency
62.9
Usage
30.1
Consistency
82.8
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 53. Northern Illinois: 124. Wake Forest: 159. Unknown: 146. Boston College: 220. Kent State: 132. Eastern Michigan: 231. Ball State: 139. Air Force: 201. Rutgers: 157. Temple: 209. Navy: 144
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 17 by 23.2. Northern Illinois: 30 by 49.6. Wake Forest: 26 by 78.1. Unknown: 26 by 62.4. Boston College: 34 by 65.2. Kent State: 28 by 62.9. Eastern Michigan: 21 by 62.9. Ball State: 22 by 70.7. Air Force: 35 by 75.4. Rutgers: 43 by 51.8. Temple: 27 by 73.9. Navy: 22 by 79.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
79.1 vs Navy
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/8 | vs NavyDual-threat | L 13-17 | 4 | 5 | 48 | 80.0 | 0 | 0 | 79.1 | 17 | 96 | 5.60 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Temple3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 32-63 | 3 | 7 | 70 | 42.9 | 0 | 0 | 73.9 | 20 | 139 | 6.90 | 3 | 56 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ RutgersDual-threat | L 7-28 | 7 | 17 | 55 | 41.2 | 0 | 0 | 51.8 | 26 | 102 | 3.90 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Air ForceDual-threat | W 41-21 | 4 | 6 | 100 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 75.4 | 29 | 101 | 3.50 | 2 | 11 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Ball StateDual-threat | L 22-30 | 3 | 5 | 38 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 70.7 | 17 | 101 | 5.90 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Eastern MichiganDual-threat | L 38-48 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | 62.9 | 16 | 212 | 13.30 | 2 | 75 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Kent StateDual-threat | L 17-31 | 5 | 9 | 66 | 55.6 | 0 | 0 | 62.9 | 19 | 66 | 3.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Boston College3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 34-31 | 5 | 12 | 79 | 41.7 | 0 | 0 | 65.2 | 22 | 141 | 6.40 | 3 | 29 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs UnknownDual-threat | — | 4 | 9 | 57 | 44.4 | 0 | 0 | 62.4 | 17 | 89 | 5.20 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Wake Forest3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 37-49 | 3 | 4 | 77 | 75.0 | 1 | 0 | 78.1 | 22 | 82 | 3.70 | 3 | 16 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Northern IllinoisDual-threat | L 40-41 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 49.6 | 27 | 116 | 4.30 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ San Diego State | L 7-42 | 3 | 8 | 50 | 37.5 | 0 | 2 | 23.2 | 9 | 3 | 0.30 | 0 | 3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Army | 1,343 | 55.8 | 34.7 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Army | 1,716 | 60.3 | 27.5 | 373 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Army | 1,716 | 60.3 | 27.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Army | 1,069 | 59.4 | 23 | -647 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Army | 1,915 | 62.9 | 30.1 | 846 |
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
223
Primary metric
223 total offense with 85.3 efficiency.
#2
North Texas
219
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
219 total offense with 63.1 efficiency.
#3
Rutgers
217
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
217 total offense with 65.8 efficiency.
#4
Air Force
201
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
201 total offense with 75.4 efficiency.
#5
Temple
209
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
209 total offense with 73.9 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Army
1,915 primary output · 62.9 efficiency · 30.1 usage
68.7
#2
2010 Postseason · Army
62.3
1,716 primary · 60.3 efficiency · 27.5 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Army
62.3
1,716 primary · 60.3 efficiency · 27.5 usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
3
3+ takeover TD games
25
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
6,043
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.