Usage Score
14.6
Player Dossier
2022-2025Minnesota
DL • 6'6" • 285 lbs • Shippensburg, PA, USA
Anthony Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
14.6
Efficiency
38.2
Consistency
54.8
Season Value
51.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Minnesota
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Smith, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Minnesota. Anthony Smith shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 38.2 disruption score.
Anthony Smith played DL for Minnesota. Across 4 tracked seasons, Anthony Smith recorded 80 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Minnesota.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Minnesota paired 33 primary output with 38.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 38.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
2.8
Efficiency
38.2
Usage
14.6
Consistency
54.8
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 8. Buffalo: 3. Unknown: 3. California: 2. Rutgers: 3.5. Purdue: 0.5. Nebraska: 5. Iowa: 0.5. Michigan State: 3.5. Oregon: 2. Northwestern: 2. Wisconsin: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 6 by 75. Buffalo: 2 by 38.3. Unknown: 3 by 42.5. California: 2 by 28.3. Rutgers: 4 by 51.7. Purdue: 2 by 13.3. Nebraska: 5 by 70.8. Iowa: 3 by 17.5. Michigan State: 5 by 55.8. Oregon: 2 by 28.3. Northwestern: 3 by 32.5. Wisconsin: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico
Best efficiency game
75 vs New Mexico
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/26 | vs New Mexico2+ sacks · Splash game | W 20-17 | 6 | 6 | — | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Wisconsin | W 17-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Northwestern | L 35-38 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Oregon | L 13-42 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Michigan StateSplash game | W 23-20 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Iowa | L 3-41 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Nebraska2+ sacks · Splash game | W 24-6 | 5 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Purdue | W 27-20 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs RutgersSplash game | W 31-28 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/14 | @ California | L 14-27 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Buffalo | W 23-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Minnesota
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Minnesota | 0 | 4.2 | 1.4 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Minnesota | 3 | 11 | 3.1 | 3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Minnesota | 3 | 11 | 3.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Minnesota | 18.5 | 24.8 | 10.2 | 15.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Minnesota | 18.5 | 24.8 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Minnesota | 33 | 38.2 | 14.6 | 14.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Minnesota | 33 | 38.2 | 14.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
New Mexico
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
8
Primary metric
8 disruption/tackle impact with 68.2 takeover score.
#2
UCLA
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 59 takeover score.
#3
Penn State
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.9 takeover score.
#4
Illinois
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.6 takeover score.
#5
Nebraska
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Minnesota
33 primary output · 38.2 efficiency · 14.6 usage
51.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · Minnesota
51.9
33 primary · 38.2 efficiency · 14.6 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Minnesota
35.4
18.5 primary · 24.8 efficiency · 10.2 usage
1
Impact games
7
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8996
Shippensburg Area · Shippensburg, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
80
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.