Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2012Army
RB • 5'8" • Wexford, PA, USA
Brian Austin leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Usage / Role
3%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
17
Developing production for a back
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
21
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Brian Austin, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Army. Brian Austin leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2010 Regular Season | Army | 2 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 40.6 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Army | 3 | 62 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 65.7 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Related Context
Brian Austin played RB for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Brian Austin recorded 87 rushing yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Army paired 62 primary output with 86.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 86.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Loss with 32 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
3
Scrimmage Yards / G
20.7
Efficiency
86.3
Usage
3.9
Consistency
65.3
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ball State: 0. Fordham: 30. Temple: 32
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
94.4 vs Temple
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Army | 25 | 46.9 | 5.2 | 25 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Army | 62 | 86.3 | 3.9 | 37 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | -62 |
#1 Featured game
@ Temple
Week 12 · L 14-42
Loss with 32 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
32
Scrimmage Yards
69.4 takeover
32 scrimmage yards and 4.8 usage.
#2
vs Fordham
Week 9 · W 55-0
30
Scrimmage Yards
63.9 takeover
Win with 30 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
30 scrimmage yards and 6.9 usage.
#3
vs VMI
Week 9 · W 29-7
21
Scrimmage Yards
63.3 takeover
Win with 21 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
21 scrimmage yards and 5.9 usage.
#4
@ Notre Dame
Week 12 · L 3-27 · Conference game
4
Scrimmage Yards
17.5 takeover
Loss with 4 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
4 scrimmage yards and 4.4 usage.
#5
@ Ball State
Week 4 · L 21-48
0
Scrimmage Yards
0 takeover
Loss with 0 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
0 scrimmage yards and 0 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · Army
62 primary output · 86.3 efficiency · 3.9 usage
65.7
#2
2010 Regular Season · Army
40.6
25 primary · 46.9 efficiency · 5.2 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Army
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.