Usage Score
18.3
Player Dossier
2022-2025Notre Dame
Eli Raridon
TE • 6'7" • 251 lbs • Des Moines, IA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Eli Raridon reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.8
Consistency
65.5
Season Value
64.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame
222323242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: NC State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eli Raridon, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Eli Raridon reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Eli Raridon played TE for Notre Dame. Across 4 tracked seasons, Eli Raridon recorded 623 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Notre Dame.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 482 primary output with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: NC State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
53.6
Efficiency
73.8
Usage
18.3
Consistency
65.5
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 97. Texas A&M: 85. Arkansas: 43. Boise State: 8. NC State: 109. USC: 5. Boston College: 59. Pittsburgh: 67. Stanford: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 5 by 100. Texas A&M: 4 by 100. Arkansas: 2 by 100. Boise State: 2 by 26.7. NC State: 7 by 100. USC: 1 by 33.3. Boston College: 3 by 100. Pittsburgh: 6 by 74.4. Stanford: 2 by 30
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins42.9 · Games = 7 · -48.1 vs Losses
Losses91 · Games = 2 · +48.1 vs Wins
First Half68.4 · Games = 5 · +33.4 vs Second Half
Second Half35 · Games = 4 · -33.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
NC State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Boston College
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/30 | @ Stanford | W 49-20 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Pittsburgh | W 37-15 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Boston College | W 25-10 | — | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs USC | W 34-24 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs NC State100 receiving yards | W 36-7 | — | 7 | 109 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Boise State | W 28-7 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Arkansas | W 56-13 | — | 2 | 43 | 21.5 | 21.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Texas A&M | L 40-41 | — | 4 | 85 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 0 | 43 |
| Sun 8/31 | @ Miami | L 24-27 | — | 5 | 97 | 19.4 | 19.40 | 0 | 65 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202220232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Notre Dame | 51 | 63.4 | 12.9 | 51 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 51 | 63.4 | 12.9 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Notre Dame | 90 | 49.5 | 8.2 | 39 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 90 | 49.5 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 482 | 73.8 | 18.3 | 392 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
NC State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
109
Primary metric
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami
97
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wake Forest
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Texas A&M
85
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Purdue
30
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame
482 primary output · 73.8 efficiency · 18.3 usage
64.4
#2
2023 Postseason · Notre Dame
38.1
51 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 12.9 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Notre Dame
38.1
51 primary · 63.4 efficiency · 12.9 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.931
Valley · West Des Moines, IA
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
623
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 18 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.