Usage Score
19.1
Player Dossier
2009-2012Mississippi State
WR • 6'2" • Meridian, MS, USA
Chris Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
19.1
Efficiency
78.2
Consistency
73.9
Season Value
67.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Mississippi State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Mississippi State. Chris Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 564 primary output with 78.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
43.4
Efficiency
78.2
Usage
19.1
Consistency
73.9
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 24. Unknown: 28. Auburn: 46. Troy: 58. South Alabama: 45. Kentucky: 19. Tennessee: 31. Middle Tennessee: 66. Alabama: 73. Texas A&M: 60. LSU: 56. Arkansas: 23. Ole Miss: 35
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 2 by 80. Unknown: 2 by 93.3. Auburn: 5 by 61.3. Troy: 3 by 100. South Alabama: 3 by 100. Kentucky: 3 by 42.2. Tennessee: 3 by 68.9. Middle Tennessee: 7 by 62.9. Alabama: 3 by 100. Texas A&M: 4 by 100. LSU: 7 by 53.3. Arkansas: 2 by 76.7. Ole Miss: 3 by 77.8
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Alabama
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas A&M
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ Northwestern | L 20-34 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/25 | @ Ole Miss | L 24-41 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Arkansas | W 45-14 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/11 | @ LSU | L 17-37 | — | 7 | 56 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Texas A&M | L 13-38 | — | 4 | 60 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 42 |
| Sun 10/28 | @ Alabama | L 7-38 | — | 3 | 73 | 24.3 | 24.30 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Middle Tennessee2+ TD | W 45-3 | — | 7 | 66 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 2 | 22 |
| Sun 10/14 | vs Tennessee | W 41-31 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Kentucky | W 27-14 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs South Alabama | W 30-10 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Troy | W 30-24 | — | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Auburn | W 28-10 | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 15 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Mississippi State
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 22 | 48.9 | 6.3 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Mississippi State | 264 | 65.8 | 16.8 | 242 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 264 | 65.8 | 16.8 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Mississippi State | 330 | 63 | 21.4 | 66 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 330 | 63 | 21.4 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Mississippi State | 564 | 78.2 | 19.1 | 234 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 564 | 78.2 | 19.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
78
Primary metric
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
47
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Alabama
73
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Troy
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wake Forest
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 62.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Mississippi State
564 primary output · 78.2 efficiency · 19.1 usage
67.8
#2
2012 Regular Season · Mississippi State
67.8
564 primary · 78.2 efficiency · 19.1 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Mississippi State
54.4
330 primary · 63 efficiency · 21.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.76
Puyallup · Puyallup, WA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,180
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Chris Smith quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit