Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 2,892 primary output with 56.5 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2010 Postseason | Mississippi State | 8 | -2 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 35 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 8 | 699 | 635 | 64 | 5 | 35 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 8 | 1,079 | 1,034 | 45 | 9 | 49.3 |
| 2012 Postseason | Mississippi State | 13 | 94 | 106 | -12 | 2 | 66.1 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 13 | 2,798 | 2,791 | 7 | 24 | 66.1 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 7 | 890 | 875 | 15 | 5 | 45.9 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 2,892 primary output with 56.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 58.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with 268 yards of offense and 60.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Primary Metric / G
127.1
Efficiency
58.1
Usage
10.4
Consistency
71.7
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 135. LSU: 139. Bowling Green: 105. Kentucky: 15. Texas A&M: 80. Alabama: 148. Arkansas: 268
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 22 by 52.5. LSU: 17 by 65.9. Bowling Green: 17 by 64.1. Kentucky: 4 by 54.2. Texas A&M: 15 by 58.2. Alabama: 28 by 51.5. Arkansas: 32 by 60.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.