Usage Score
14.6
Player Dossier
2009-2013Rutgers
Quron Pratt
WR • 6'0" • Palmyra, NJ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Quron Pratt reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.9
Consistency
39.3
Season Value
58.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Rutgers
0910111112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Quron Pratt, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Rutgers. Quron Pratt reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Rutgers paired 516 primary output with 80.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Rutgers
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
43
Efficiency
80.9
Usage
14.6
Consistency
39.3
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 23. Fresno State: 47. Unknown: 28. Eastern Michigan: 20. Arkansas: 66. SMU: 4. Louisville: 14. Temple: 88. Cincinnati: 55. UCF: 16. UConn: 132. South Florida: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. Fresno State: 3 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 93.3. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 66.7. Arkansas: 5 by 88. SMU: 1 by 26.7. Louisville: 1 by 93.3. Temple: 5 by 100. Cincinnati: 5 by 73.3. UCF: 2 by 53.3. UConn: 3 by 100. South Florida: 2 by 76.7
Split Comparison
Wins40.2 · n=5 · -7.6 vs Losses
Losses47.8 · n=6 · +7.6 vs Wins
First Half31.3 · n=6 · -23.3 vs Second Half
Second Half54.7 · n=6 · +23.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UConn
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | @ Notre Dame | L 16-29 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 12/8 | vs South Florida | W 31-6 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ UConn100 receiving yards | L 17-28 | — | 3 | 132 | 44 | 44 | 0 | 84 |
| Fri 11/22 | @ UCF | L 17-41 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Cincinnati | L 17-52 | — | 5 | 55 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Temple | W 23-20 | — | 5 | 88 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 0 | 41 |
| Thu 10/10 | @ Louisville | L 10-24 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ SMU | W 55-52 | — | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Arkansas | W 28-24 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 28-10 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 16 |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Fresno State | L 51-52 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Rutgers | 14 | 93.3 | 6.7 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | -14 |
| 2011 Postseason | Rutgers | 327 | 70.2 | 13.6 | 327 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rutgers | 327 | 70.2 | 13.6 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rutgers | 230 | 56.1 | 11.3 | -97 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rutgers | 230 | 56.1 | 11.3 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Rutgers | 516 | 80.9 | 14.6 | 286 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 516 | 80.9 | 14.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85
Primary metric
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UConn
132
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
14
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Temple
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Syracuse
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 62.2 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Rutgers
516 primary output · 80.9 efficiency · 14.6 usage
58.7
#2
2013 Regular Season · Rutgers
58.7
516 primary · 80.9 efficiency · 14.6 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Rutgers
54.3
327 primary · 70.2 efficiency · 13.6 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8567
Palmyra · Palmyra, NJ
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,087
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.