Usage Score
20.7
Player Dossier
2009-2012Rutgers
WR • 6'3" • Stratford, CT, USA
Mark Harrison reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20.7
Efficiency
71.4
Consistency
39.6
Season Value
50.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Rutgers
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mark Harrison, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Rutgers. Mark Harrison reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 829 primary output with 91.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
44.8
Efficiency
71.4
Usage
20.7
Consistency
39.6
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 23. Tulane: 21. Unknown: 16. South Florida: 41. Arkansas: 87. UConn: 33. Syracuse: 12. Temple: 28. Kent State: 44. Army: 15. Cincinnati: 106. Pittsburgh: 26. Louisville: 131
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 2 by 76.7. Tulane: 2 by 70. Unknown: 6 by 17.8. South Florida: 5 by 54.7. Arkansas: 4 by 100. UConn: 4 by 55. Syracuse: 1 by 80. Temple: 2 by 93.3. Kent State: 4 by 73.3. Army: 2 by 50. Cincinnati: 4 by 100. Pittsburgh: 3 by 57.8. Louisville: 5 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
100 vs Louisville
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/28 | @ Virginia Tech | L 10-13 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Fri 11/30 | vs Louisville100 receiving yards | L 17-20 | — | 5 | 131 | 26.2 | 26.20 | 1 | 68 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Pittsburgh | L 6-27 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Cincinnati100 receiving yards | W 10-3 | — | 4 | 106 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 1 | 71 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Army | W 28-7 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Kent State | L 23-35 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Temple | W 35-10 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Syracuse | W 23-15 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs UConn | W 19-3 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Arkansas | W 35-26 | — | 4 | 87 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 1 | 60 |
| Thu 9/13 | @ South Florida | W 23-13 | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 16 | 2.7 | 2.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/2 | @ Tulane | W 24-12 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rutgers
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Rutgers | 83 | 83.3 | 13.4 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Rutgers | 83 | 83.3 | 13.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Rutgers | 829 | 91.6 | 27.1 | 746 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rutgers | 274 | 92.4 | 10.4 | -555 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rutgers | 583 | 71.4 | 20.7 | 309 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rutgers | 583 | 71.4 | 20.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
240
Primary metric
240 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisville
131
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Army
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Syracuse
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Cincinnati
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Rutgers
829 primary output · 91.6 efficiency · 27.1 usage
68
#2
2011 Regular Season · Rutgers
51.9
274 primary · 92.4 efficiency · 10.4 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Rutgers
50.3
583 primary · 71.4 efficiency · 20.7 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8567
Bunnell · Stratford, CT
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,769
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Mark Harrison quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit