Usage Score
16.2
Player Dossier
2009-2013Ole Miss
Ja-Mes Logan
WR • 6'3" • Houston, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ja-Mes Logan reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.8
Consistency
49.2
Season Value
58.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Ole Miss
091011121213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ja-Mes Logan, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Ole Miss. Ja-Mes Logan reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Ole Miss paired 583 primary output with 68.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Idaho
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Ole Miss
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
53
Efficiency
68.8
Usage
16.2
Consistency
49.2
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Vanderbilt: 39. Unknown: 30. Alabama: 22. Auburn: 92. Texas A&M: 16. LSU: 65. Idaho: 122. Arkansas: 110. Troy: 1. Missouri: 35. Mississippi State: 51
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Vanderbilt: 5 by 52. Unknown: 3 by 66.7. Alabama: 2 by 73.3. Auburn: 5 by 100. Texas A&M: 2 by 53.3. LSU: 7 by 61.9. Idaho: 6 by 100. Arkansas: 5 by 100. Troy: 1 by 6.7. Missouri: 4 by 58.3. Mississippi State: 4 by 85
Split Comparison
Wins67.4 · n=5 · +24.2 vs Losses
Losses43.2 · n=5 · -24.2 vs Wins
First Half44 · n=6 · -19.8 vs Second Half
Second Half63.8 · n=5 · +19.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Idaho
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | @ Mississippi State | L 10-17 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Missouri | L 10-24 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Troy | W 51-21 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Arkansas100 receiving yards | W 34-24 | — | 5 | 110 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Idaho100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 59-14 | — | 6 | 122 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 2 | 65 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs LSU | W 27-24 | — | 7 | 65 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 10/13 | vs Texas A&M | L 38-41 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Auburn | L 22-30 | — | 5 | 92 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Alabama | L 0-25 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Vanderbilt | W 39-35 | — | 5 | 39 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920102011201220122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 387 | 72.9 | 15.6 | 387 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 274 | 79.6 | 19.7 | -113 |
| 2012 Postseason | Ole Miss | 490 | 63.2 | 17.3 | 216 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 490 | 63.2 | 17.3 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 583 | 68.8 | 16.2 | 93 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Fresno State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65
Primary metric
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Idaho
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Vanderbilt
160
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
160 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arkansas
110
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Ole Miss
583 primary output · 68.8 efficiency · 16.2 usage
58.4
#2
2010 Regular Season · Ole Miss
52.9
387 primary · 72.9 efficiency · 15.6 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Ole Miss
52.3
490 primary · 63.2 efficiency · 17.3 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8533
Westfield · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- Ole Miss
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,734
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.