Usage Score
21.2
Player Dossier
2009-2012Texas A&M
WR • 6'0" • Austin, TX, USA
Ryan Swope reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
21.2
Efficiency
66.5
Consistency
63.9
Season Value
58.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ryan Swope, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Texas A&M. Ryan Swope reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 1,207 primary output with 82.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 66.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
70.2
Efficiency
66.5
Usage
21.2
Consistency
63.9
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 104. Florida: 16. SMU: 70. Unknown: 9. Arkansas: 141. Ole Miss: 58. Louisiana Tech: 5. LSU: 81. Auburn: 140. Mississippi State: 121. Alabama: 111. Unknown: 6. Missouri: 51
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 8 by 86.7. Florida: 5 by 21.3. SMU: 5 by 93.3. Unknown: 2 by 30. Arkansas: 5 by 100. Ole Miss: 2 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 33.3. LSU: 10 by 54. Auburn: 6 by 100. Mississippi State: 9 by 89.6. Alabama: 11 by 67.3. Unknown: 1 by 40. Missouri: 7 by 48.6
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
100 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/5 | @ Oklahoma100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-13 | — | 8 | 104 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 11/25 | vs Missouri | W 59-29 | — | 7 | 51 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Alabama100 receiving yards · High volume | W 29-24 | — | 11 | 111 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Mississippi State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-13 | — | 9 | 121 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Auburn100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 63-21 | — | 6 | 140 | 23.3 | 23.30 | 2 | 50 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs LSUHigh volume | L 19-24 | — | 10 | 81 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 10/14 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 59-57 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Ole Miss | W 30-27 | — | 2 | 58 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Arkansas100 receiving yards | W 58-10 | — | 5 | 141 | 28.2 | 28.20 | 1 | 80 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 9 | 2.3 | 4.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ SMU | W 48-3 | — | 5 | 70 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Florida | L 17-20 | — | 5 | 16 | 3.2 | 3.20 | 0 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Texas A&M | 172 | 57.7 | 10.5 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 172 | 57.7 | 10.5 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Texas A&M | 825 | 75.9 | 23.3 | 653 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 825 | 75.9 | 23.3 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Texas A&M | 1,207 | 82.4 | 27 | 382 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1,207 | 82.4 | 27 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Texas A&M | 913 | 66.5 | 21.2 | -294 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 913 | 66.5 | 21.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Baylor
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
206
Primary metric
206 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Auburn
140
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas
141
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Kansas
137
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Texas A&M
1,207 primary output · 82.4 efficiency · 27 usage
69.1
#2
2011 Regular Season · Texas A&M
69.1
1,207 primary · 82.4 efficiency · 27 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Texas A&M
58.2
913 primary · 66.5 efficiency · 21.2 usage
14
100+ receiving yards
14
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9932
Ryan · Denton, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
3,117
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Ryan Swope quick answers
Recruiting profile
5-star recruit