Usage Score
5.8
Player Dossier
2009-2011Texas A&M
Hutson Prioleau
TE • 6'4" • Fort Worth, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Hutson Prioleau reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
58.1
Consistency
66.6
Season Value
57.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Texas A&M
0910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hutson Prioleau, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Texas A&M. Hutson Prioleau reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Hutson Prioleau played TE for Texas A&M. Across 3 tracked seasons, Hutson Prioleau recorded 1 rushing yards, 193 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Texas A&M.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 135 primary output with 58.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 58.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
15
Efficiency
58.1
Usage
5.8
Consistency
66.6
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 2. SMU: 32. Idaho: 21. Arkansas: 8. Iowa State: 17. Missouri: 18. Oklahoma: 11. Kansas State: 18. Kansas: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 1 by 13.3. SMU: 1 by 100. Idaho: 1 by 100. Arkansas: 2 by 26.7. Iowa State: 2 by 56.7. Missouri: 3 by 40. Oklahoma: 1 by 73.3. Kansas State: 2 by 60. Kansas: 1 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins16 · Games = 5 · +2.3 vs Losses
Losses13.8 · Games = 4 · -2.3 vs Wins
First Half16 · Games = 5 · +2.3 vs Second Half
Second Half13.8 · Games = 4 · -2.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Idaho
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Northwestern | W 33-22 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Kansas | W 61-7 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Kansas State | L 50-53 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Oklahoma | L 25-41 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Missouri | L 31-38 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Iowa State | W 33-17 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Arkansas | L 38-42 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Idaho | W 37-7 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs SMU | W 46-14 | — | 1 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 1 | 32 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Texas A&M | 58 | 41 | 5.7 | 58 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 58 | 41 | 5.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Texas A&M | 135 | 58.1 | 5.8 | 77 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 135 | 58.1 | 5.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32
Primary metric
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
18
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Idaho
21
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oklahoma
14
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Kansas State
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Texas A&M
135 primary output · 58.1 efficiency · 5.8 usage
57.6
#2
2011 Regular Season · Texas A&M
57.6
135 primary · 58.1 efficiency · 5.8 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Texas A&M
36.8
58 primary · 41 efficiency · 5.7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.7533
North Shore · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
193
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.