Usage Score
9.1
Player Dossier
2009-2012Texas A&M
WR • 6'1" • Navasota, TX, USA
Brandal Jackson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.1
Efficiency
81.1
Consistency
78.1
Season Value
53.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandal Jackson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Texas A&M. Brandal Jackson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 272 primary output with 80.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
27
Efficiency
81.1
Usage
9.1
Consistency
78.1
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 32. Texas Tech: 8. Kansas: 33. Texas: 35
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 3 by 71.1. Texas Tech: 1 by 53.3. Kansas: 2 by 100. Texas: 2 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Texas A&M | 272 | 80.8 | 8.9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 272 | 80.8 | 8.9 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Texas A&M | 112 | 78.7 | 6.6 | -160 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 112 | 78.7 | 6.6 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 108 | 81.1 | 9.1 | -4 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | -108 |
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
118
Primary metric
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kansas
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas
35
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kansas
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma State
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 71.1 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Texas A&M
272 primary output · 80.8 efficiency · 8.9 usage
56.6
#2
2009 Regular Season · Texas A&M
56.6
272 primary · 80.8 efficiency · 8.9 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Texas A&M
53.7
108 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 9.1 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8954
Navasota · Navasota, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
492
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brandal Jackson quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit