Player Stats

Adam Froman College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
3,140
Passing yards
2,987
Rushing yards
153
Touchdowns
19

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonLouisville71,4321,35478668.5
2010 Regular SeasonLouisville81,7081,633751367.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season

Louisville paired 1,432 primary output with 56.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 62.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State

Loss with 334 yards of offense and 67 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Regular Season · Louisville

Games

8

Primary Metric / G

213.5

Efficiency

62.8

Usage

12.7

Consistency

78.8

Best Game by takeover score

Oregon State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 132. Eastern Kentucky: 239. Oregon State: 334. Arkansas State: 302. Memphis: 246. Cincinnati: 176. UConn: 215. Pittsburgh: 64

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 34 by 45.2. Eastern Kentucky: 28 by 66.8. Oregon State: 46 by 67. Arkansas State: 37 by 56.6. Memphis: 17 by 93.8. Cincinnati: 32 by 55.5. UConn: 33 by 70.2. Pittsburgh: 27 by 47.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins250.5 · Games = 4 · +74 vs Losses
Losses176.5 · Games = 4 · -74 vs Wins