Usage Score
18.8
Player Dossier
2009-2013Louisville
Damian Copeland
WR • 6'1" • Bradenton, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Damian Copeland reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84.4
Consistency
65.6
Season Value
67.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Louisville
09101112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Louisville
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Damian Copeland, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Louisville. Damian Copeland reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Louisville paired 780 primary output with 84.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Louisville
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
60
Efficiency
84.4
Usage
18.8
Consistency
65.6
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 90. Ohio: 98. Unknown: 32. Kentucky: 81. Florida International: 29. Temple: 24. Rutgers: 115. UCF: 44. South Florida: 63. UConn: 83. Houston: 31. Memphis: 55. Cincinnati: 35
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 6 by 100. Ohio: 6 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 71.1. Kentucky: 3 by 100. Florida International: 2 by 96.7. Temple: 1 by 100. Rutgers: 8 by 95.8. UCF: 5 by 58.7. South Florida: 5 by 84. UConn: 6 by 92.2. Houston: 3 by 68.9. Memphis: 7 by 52.4. Cincinnati: 3 by 77.8
Split Comparison
Wins64 · n=11
First Half67 · n=7 · +15.2 vs Second Half
Second Half51.8 · n=6 · -15.2 vs First Half
All Games60 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs Miami | W 36-9 | — | 6 | 90 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Fri 12/6 | @ Cincinnati | W 31-24 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Memphis | W 24-17 | — | 7 | 55 | 7.9 | 7.90 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs Houston | W 20-13 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ UConn | W 31-10 | — | 6 | 83 | 11.1 | 13.80 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ South Florida | W 34-3 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs UCF | L 35-38 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Thu 10/10 | vs Rutgers100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-10 | — | 8 | 115 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Temple | W 30-7 | — | 1 | 24 | 19.5 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Florida International | W 72-0 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Kentucky | W 27-13 | — | 3 | 81 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Ohio2+ TD | W 49-7 | — | 6 | 98 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 2 | 34 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisville
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Louisville | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Louisville | 113 | 75 | 11.6 | 113 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Louisville | 0 | — | — | -113 |
| 2012 Postseason | Louisville | 628 | 72.2 | 17.1 | 628 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Louisville | 628 | 72.2 | 17.1 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Louisville | 780 | 84.4 | 18.8 | 152 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Louisville | 780 | 84.4 | 18.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
115
Primary metric
115 receiving yards with a 95.8 efficiency score.
#2
Cincinnati
96
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
93
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas State
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UConn
95
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Louisville
780 primary output · 84.4 efficiency · 18.8 usage
67.2
#2
2013 Regular Season · Louisville
67.2
780 primary · 84.4 efficiency · 18.8 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Louisville
59
628 primary · 72.2 efficiency · 17.1 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7889
Palmetto · Palmetto, FL
- Committed To
- Louisville
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,521
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.