Player Stats

Devin Street College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,901
Receptions
202
Touchdowns
16

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonPittsburgh0-00-
2010 PostseasonPittsburgh1212046.9
2010 Regular SeasonPittsburgh1224316246.9
2011 PostseasonPittsburgh12562076.4
2011 Regular SeasonPittsburgh1248692276.4
2012 PostseasonPittsburgh13783187.8
2012 Regular SeasonPittsburgh1366892487.8
2013 Regular SeasonPittsburgh1051854784.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Pittsburgh paired 975 primary output with 83.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 85.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

85.4

Efficiency

85.1

Usage

28.3

Consistency

71.2

Best Game by takeover score

Duke

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 141. New Mexico: 80. Duke: 166. Virginia: 58. Virginia Tech: 104. Navy: 96. Georgia Tech: 45. Notre Dame: 76. North Carolina: 81. Syracuse: 7

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 6 by 100. New Mexico: 5 by 100. Duke: 6 by 100. Virginia: 4 by 96.7. Virginia Tech: 5 by 100. Navy: 9 by 71.1. Georgia Tech: 5 by 60. Notre Dame: 4 by 100. North Carolina: 5 by 100. Syracuse: 2 by 23.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins77.4 · Games = 5 · -16 vs Losses
Losses93.4 · Games = 5 · +16 vs Wins