Usage Score
9.1
Player Dossier
2009-2013Pittsburgh
WR • 6'2" • Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Ed Tinker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.1
Efficiency
60
Consistency
100
Season Value
46.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ed Tinker, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Ed Tinker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Ed Tinker played WR for Pittsburgh. Across 5 tracked seasons, Ed Tinker recorded 77 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 68 primary output with 70.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
1
Receiving Yards / G
9
Efficiency
60
Usage
9.1
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Unknown
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
60 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 10/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Pittsburgh
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 68 | 70.8 | 6.5 | 68 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 68 | 70.8 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 9 | 60 | 9.1 | -59 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
32
Primary metric
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
9
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#3
Ole Miss
14
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Rutgers
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 56.7 efficiency score.
#5
South Florida
5
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
5 receiving yards with a 33.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Pittsburgh
68 primary output · 70.8 efficiency · 6.5 usage
61.8
#2
2012 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
61.8
68 primary · 70.8 efficiency · 6.5 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
46.3
9 primary · 60 efficiency · 9.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8415
North Carolina Tech · Charlotte, NC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
77
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 5 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.