Usage Score
37.8
Player Dossier
2009-2012Pittsburgh
Ray Graham
RB • 5'9" • Elizabeth, NJ, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Ray Graham leans workhorse runner traits and 52.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
52.5
Consistency
69.4
Season Value
64.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
090910101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ray Graham, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. Ray Graham leans workhorse runner traits and 52.5 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Pittsburgh paired 1,158 primary output with 62.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 52.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
115.2
Efficiency
52.5
Usage
37.8
Consistency
69.4
Best Game by takeover score
South Florida
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 71. Cincinnati: 154. Virginia Tech: 111. Unknown: 117. Syracuse: 88. Louisville: 71. Buffalo: 74. Temple: 180. Notre Dame: 197. UConn: 62. Rutgers: 163. South Florida: 94
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 14 by 52.8. Cincinnati: 23 by 61.8. Virginia Tech: 26 by 42.3. Unknown: 11 by 94.3. Syracuse: 28 by 27.9. Louisville: 11 by 47.7. Buffalo: 20 by 38.5. Temple: 23 by 68.5. Notre Dame: 30 by 72.2. UConn: 18 by 31.4. Rutgers: 28 by 55. South Florida: 26 by 37.7
Split Comparison
Wins124.4 · n=5 · +10 vs Losses
Losses114.4 · n=5 · -10 vs Wins
First Half102 · n=6 · -26.3 vs Second Half
Second Half128.3 · n=6 · +26.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
94.3 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/2 | @ South Florida2+ TD | W 27-3 | 26 | 94 | 3.60 | 2 | — | — | 3.6 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Rutgers100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 27-6 | 23 | 113 | 4.90 | 1 | 5 | 50 | 5.8 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ UConn | L 17-24 | 15 | 41 | 2.70 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 3.4 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Notre Dame100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 26-29 | 24 | 172 | 7.20 | 1 | 6 | 25 | 6.6 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Temple100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 47-17 | 19 | 109 | 5.70 | 2 | 4 | 71 | 7.8 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Buffalo | W 20-6 | 20 | 74 | 3.70 | 1 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Louisville | L 35-45 | 6 | 20 | 3.30 | 0 | 5 | 51 | 6.5 |
| Fri 10/5 | @ Syracuse | L 13-14 | 24 | 57 | 2.40 | 1 | 4 | 31 | 3.1 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 94 | 11.80 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 10.6 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Virginia Tech2+ TD | W 35-17 | 24 | 94 | 3.90 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 4.3 |
| Fri 9/7 | @ Cincinnati100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 10-34 | 19 | 103 | 5.40 | 0 | 4 | 51 | 6.7 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 14 | 71 | 5.10 | 0 | — | — | 5.1 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920092010201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 395 | 42 | 9.8 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 395 | 42 | 9.8 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 1,135 | 60.4 | 27.2 | 740 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1,135 | 60.4 | 27.2 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1,158 | 62.3 | 41.2 | 23 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1,382 | 52.5 | 37.8 | 224 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
296
Primary metric
296 scrimmage yards and 62.7 usage.
#2
Notre Dame
197
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
197 scrimmage yards and 57.7 usage.
#3
South Florida
268
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
268 scrimmage yards and 38 usage.
#4
Buffalo
207
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
207 scrimmage yards and 57.4 usage.
#5
South Florida
88
Primary metric
Win with 88 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
88 scrimmage yards and 18 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
1,158 primary output · 62.3 efficiency · 41.2 usage
65.3
#2
2012 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
64.7
1,382 primary · 52.5 efficiency · 37.8 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Pittsburgh
54.2
1,135 primary · 60.4 efficiency · 27.2 usage
Milestones
16
100+ rush yards
9
150+ scrimmage yards
8
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8943
Elizabeth · Elizabeth, NJ
- Committed To
- Pittsburgh
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
4,070
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.