Player Stats

Jonathan George College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,093
Rushing yards
795
Receiving yards
298
Touchdowns
9

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonKentucky00000-
2010 Regular SeasonKentucky425250028.7
2011 Regular SeasonKentucky821820810237.4
2012 Regular SeasonKentucky12727504223570.1
2013 Regular SeasonKentucky61235865226.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season

Kentucky paired 727 primary output with 56.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 33.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Win with 75 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Regular Season · Kentucky

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

20.5

Efficiency

33.6

Usage

7.4

Consistency

33.9

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 12. Miami (OH): 75. Louisville: 16. Alabama: 17. Alabama State: 1. Tennessee: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 7 by 17.9. Miami (OH): 7 by 72.8. Louisville: 4 by 37.5. Alabama: 3 by 42.4. Alabama State: 1 by 10.4. Tennessee: 1 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins38 · Games = 2 · +26.3 vs Losses
Losses11.8 · Games = 4 · -26.3 vs Wins