Usage Score
5.7
Player Dossier
2009-2012Duke
WR • 5'11" • Durham, NC, USA
Corey Gattis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
5.7
Efficiency
68.1
Consistency
37.1
Season Value
52.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Duke
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Corey Gattis, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Duke. Corey Gattis reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Corey Gattis played WR for Duke. Across 4 tracked seasons, Corey Gattis recorded 60 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Duke.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Duke paired 63 primary output with 68.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
12.6
Efficiency
68.1
Usage
5.7
Consistency
37.1
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 0. Florida International: 9. Stanford: 20. Unknown: 0. Miami: 34
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 1 by 60. Stanford: 3 by 44.4. Miami: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Duke
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Duke | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Duke | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Duke | -3 | 0 | 3.6 | -3 |
| 2012 Postseason | Duke | 63 | 68.1 | 5.7 | 66 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Duke | 63 | 68.1 | 5.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Miami
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34
Primary metric
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Stanford
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 44.4 efficiency score.
#3
Florida International
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#4
Stanford
-3
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
-3 receiving yards with a 0 efficiency score.
#5
Tulane
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Duke
63 primary output · 68.1 efficiency · 5.7 usage
52.3
#2
2012 Regular Season · Duke
52.3
63 primary · 68.1 efficiency · 5.7 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Duke
29
-3 primary · 0 efficiency · 3.6 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.85
Hillside · Durham, NC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
60
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 7 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.