Usage Score
17.2
Player Dossier
2009-2013Alabama
Kevin Norwood
WR • 6'2" • D'Iberville, MS, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kevin Norwood reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.6
Consistency
63.6
Season Value
66.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Alabama
0910111112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Alabama
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kevin Norwood, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Alabama. Kevin Norwood reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Alabama paired 568 primary output with 85.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Alabama
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
47.3
Efficiency
85.6
Usage
17.2
Consistency
63.6
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 30. Virginia Tech: 11. Texas A&M: 52. Ole Miss: 40. Georgia State: 42. Kentucky: 81. Arkansas: 10. Tennessee: 112. LSU: 38. Mississippi State: 23. Unknown: 84. Auburn: 45
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 2 by 100. Virginia Tech: 1 by 73.3. Texas A&M: 3 by 100. Ole Miss: 5 by 53.3. Georgia State: 3 by 93.3. Kentucky: 4 by 100. Arkansas: 1 by 66.7. Tennessee: 6 by 100. LSU: 4 by 63.3. Mississippi State: 2 by 76.7. Unknown: 4 by 100. Auburn: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins45.4 · n=9 · +7.9 vs Losses
Losses37.5 · n=2 · -7.9 vs Wins
First Half42.7 · n=6 · -9.3 vs Second Half
Second Half52 · n=6 · +9.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/3 | vs Oklahoma | L 31-45 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Auburn | L 28-34 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 84 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 50 |
| Sun 11/17 | @ Mississippi State | W 20-7 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 12 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs LSU | W 38-17 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Tennessee100 receiving yards | W 45-10 | — | 6 | 112 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Arkansas | W 52-0 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Kentucky | W 48-7 | — | 4 | 81 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Georgia State | W 45-3 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Ole Miss | W 25-0 | — | 5 | 40 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Texas A&M | W 49-42 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Virginia Tech | W 35-10 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Alabama | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Alabama | 56 | 83.4 | 8.4 | 56 |
| 2011 Postseason | Alabama | 190 | 77.8 | 11.9 | 134 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Alabama | 190 | 77.8 | 11.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Alabama | 461 | 84.1 | 17.2 | 271 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Alabama | 461 | 84.1 | 17.2 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Alabama | 568 | 85.6 | 17.2 | 107 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Alabama | 568 | 85.6 | 17.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tennessee
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112
Primary metric
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Kentucky
92
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
LSU
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Penn State
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
84
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Alabama
568 primary output · 85.6 efficiency · 17.2 usage
66.6
#2
2013 Regular Season · Alabama
66.6
568 primary · 85.6 efficiency · 17.2 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Alabama
62.4
461 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 17.2 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.9107
D'Iberville · Biloxi, MS
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,275
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.