Usage Score
9.6
Player Dossier
2009-2012Stanford
WR • 6'3" • McDonough, GA, USA
Jamal-Rashad Patterson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.6
Efficiency
64.6
Consistency
37.4
Season Value
50.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Stanford
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jamal-Rashad Patterson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Stanford. Jamal-Rashad Patterson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Stanford paired 271 primary output with 64.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 64.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
24.6
Efficiency
64.6
Usage
9.6
Consistency
37.4
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 34. San José State: 0. Duke: 29. Arizona: 71. California: 19. Washington State: 70. Colorado: 18. Oregon State: 9. Oregon: 1. UCLA: 16. UCLA: 4
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 1 by 100. Duke: 2 by 96.7. Arizona: 2 by 100. California: 3 by 42.2. Washington State: 1 by 100. Colorado: 2 by 60. Oregon State: 1 by 60. Oregon: 1 by 6.7. UCLA: 2 by 53.3. UCLA: 1 by 26.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs Wisconsin | W 20-14 | — | 1 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 12/1 | vs UCLA | W 27-24 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ UCLA | W 35-17 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Oregon | W 17-14 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Oregon State | W 27-23 | — | 1 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Colorado | W 48-0 | — | 2 | 18 | 20 | 9 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Washington State | W 24-17 | — | 1 | 70 | 41 | 70 | 1 | 70 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ California | W 21-3 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Arizona | W 54-48 | — | 2 | 71 | 35.5 | 35.50 | 0 | 54 |
| Sun 9/9 | vs Duke | W 50-13 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs San José State | W 20-17 | — | — | — | 12 | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Stanford | -1 | 0 | 9.1 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Stanford | 67 | 56 | 4.5 | 68 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Stanford | 38 | 68.9 | 4.3 | -29 |
| 2012 Postseason | Stanford | 271 | 64.6 | 9.6 | 233 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Stanford | 271 | 64.6 | 9.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Washington State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70
Primary metric
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado
22
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oregon
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wisconsin
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Stanford
271 primary output · 64.6 efficiency · 9.6 usage
50.6
#2
2012 Regular Season · Stanford
50.6
271 primary · 64.6 efficiency · 9.6 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Stanford
34.1
38 primary · 68.9 efficiency · 4.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.9322
Henry County · McDonough, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
375
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jamal-Rashad Patterson quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit