Usage / Role
7%
Rotational offensive role
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2009-2012Stanford
Geoff Meinken
FB • 6'4" • Lynnwood, WA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Geoff Meinken leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Impact Production
1
Developing production for a back
lowelite
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
lowhigh
Star Power
13
Limited ceiling signals so far
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Stanford
0910111112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Unique Seasons
- 4
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Duke
3★
- Committed To
- Stanford
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Geoff Meinken, FB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Stanford. Geoff Meinken leans balanced backfield option traits and partial efficiency context.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Scrimmage yards
- 96
- Rushing yards
- 90
- Receiving yards
- 6
Quick Answers
Geoff Meinken quick answers
- Latest team and position
- Stanford · FB
- Career Scrimmage Yards
- 96
- Tracked sample
- 4 unique seasons · 5 entries · 8 games
- Best season
- 2011 Postseason · Stanford
- Top game
- Duke
- Recruit profile
- 3-star · Lynnwood · Stanford
- High school pipeline
- Lynnwood · 3 FBS recruits · 0 drafted players
- Latest roster
- No. 10 · Class 2012
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2010 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2011 Postseason | Stanford | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 44.5 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Stanford | 8 | 94 | 88 | 6 | 0 | 44.5 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Related Context
Keep exploring Geoff Meinken
Geoff Meinken played FB for Stanford. Across 4 tracked seasons, Geoff Meinken recorded 90 rushing yards and 6 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Stanford.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Stanford paired 96 primary output with 45.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 45.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Duke
Win with 61 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Stanford
Games
8
Scrimmage Yards / G
12
Efficiency
45.5
Usage
2.6
Consistency
25
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 2. Duke: 61. UCLA: 6. Colorado: 3. Washington: 10. USC: 3. Oregon State: 10. California: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 2 by 10.4. Duke: 3 by 100. UCLA: 1 by 62.5. Colorado: 1 by 31.3. Washington: 1 by 91.7. USC: 1 by 31.3. Oregon State: 3 by 26.4. California: 1 by 10.4
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins13.4 · Games = 7 · +11.4 vs Losses
Losses2 · Games = 1 · -11.4 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Duke
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20092010201120112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Stanford | 96 | 45.5 | 2.6 | 96 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Stanford | 96 | 45.5 | 2.6 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | -96 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
@ Duke
Week 2 · W 44-14
Win with 61 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
61
Scrimmage Yards
72.4 takeover
61 scrimmage yards and 6 usage.
#2
vs Washington
Week 8 · W 65-21 · Conference game
10
Scrimmage Yards
37.7 takeover
Win with 10 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
10 scrimmage yards and 1.7 usage.
#3
vs UCLA
Week 5 · W 45-19 · Conference game
6
Scrimmage Yards
25.6 takeover
Win with 6 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
6 scrimmage yards and 1.6 usage.
#4
@ Oregon State
Week 10 · W 38-13 · Conference game
10
Scrimmage Yards
18.4 takeover
Win with 10 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
10 scrimmage yards and 4.3 usage.
#5
vs Colorado
Week 6 · W 48-7 · Conference game
3
Scrimmage Yards
13.6 takeover
Win with 3 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
3 scrimmage yards and 1.6 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Postseason · Stanford
96 primary output · 45.5 efficiency · 2.6 usage
44.5
#2
2011 Regular Season · Stanford
44.5
96 primary · 45.5 efficiency · 2.6 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Stanford
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Keep exploring Geoff Meinken
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.