Usage Score
16.1
Player Dossier
2009-2012Stanford
Drew Terrell
WR • 5'11" • Chandler, AZ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Drew Terrell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.5
Consistency
74.8
Season Value
68.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Stanford
09101011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drew Terrell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Stanford. Drew Terrell reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Stanford paired 463 primary output with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Stanford
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
35.6
Efficiency
83.5
Usage
16.1
Consistency
74.8
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 20. San José State: 33. Duke: 39. USC: 13. Arizona: 58. Notre Dame: 37. California: 45. Washington State: 35. Colorado: 42. Oregon State: 36. Oregon: 24. UCLA: 11. UCLA: 70
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 2 by 66.7. San José State: 3 by 73.3. Duke: 3 by 86.7. USC: 1 by 86.7. Arizona: 3 by 100. Notre Dame: 3 by 82.2. California: 2 by 100. Washington State: 2 by 100. Colorado: 3 by 93.3. Oregon State: 3 by 80. Oregon: 2 by 80. UCLA: 2 by 36.7. UCLA: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins35.5 · n=12
First Half35 · n=7 · -1.3 vs Second Half
Second Half36.3 · n=6 · +1.3 vs First Half
All Games35.6 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCLA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs Wisconsin | W 20-14 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 12/1 | vs UCLA | W 27-24 | — | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ UCLA | W 35-17 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 1 | 11 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Oregon | W 17-14 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Oregon State | W 27-23 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Colorado | W 48-0 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Washington State | W 24-17 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ California | W 21-3 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Notre Dame | L 13-20 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Arizona | W 54-48 | — | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs USC | W 21-14 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 9/9 | vs Duke | W 50-13 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs San José State | W 20-17 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Stanford | 2 | 13.3 | 9.1 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Stanford | 11 | 36.7 | 5.6 | 9 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Stanford | 11 | 36.7 | 5.6 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Stanford | 81 | 54.9 | 7.5 | 70 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Stanford | 81 | 54.9 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Stanford | 463 | 83.5 | 16.1 | 382 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Stanford | 463 | 83.5 | 16.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70
Primary metric
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oregon
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona
58
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Washington State
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
California
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Stanford
463 primary output · 83.5 efficiency · 16.1 usage
68.6
#2
2012 Regular Season · Stanford
68.6
463 primary · 83.5 efficiency · 16.1 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Stanford
22.7
81 primary · 54.9 efficiency · 7.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.75
East Coweta · Sharpsburg, GA
- Committed To
- Georgia Southern
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
557
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.