Usage Score
29
Player Dossier
2009-2012Oregon State
Markus Wheaton
WR • 6'1" • Chandler, AZ, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Markus Wheaton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.3
Consistency
79.3
Season Value
71.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Oregon State
090910111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oregon State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Markus Wheaton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Oregon State. Markus Wheaton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Oregon State paired 1,244 primary output with 86.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Oregon State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
95.7
Efficiency
86.3
Usage
29
Consistency
79.3
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 37. Wisconsin: 87. UCLA: 150. Arizona: 166. Washington State: 95. BYU: 66. Utah: 90. Washington: 25. Arizona State: 108. Stanford: 100. California: 99. Oregon: 98. Unknown: 123
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 3 by 82.2. Wisconsin: 8 by 72.5. UCLA: 9 by 100. Arizona: 10 by 100. Washington State: 9 by 70.4. BYU: 5 by 88. Utah: 7 by 85.7. Washington: 2 by 83.3. Arizona State: 4 by 100. Stanford: 8 by 83.3. California: 7 by 94.3. Oregon: 7 by 93.3. Unknown: 12 by 68.3
Split Comparison
Wins107.6 · n=8 · +42.6 vs Losses
Losses65 · n=4 · -42.6 vs Wins
First Half98.7 · n=7 · +6.5 vs Second Half
Second Half92.2 · n=6 · -6.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs Texas | L 27-31 | — | 3 | 37 | 9 | 12.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 12/1 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 12 | 123 | 10 | 10.30 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Oregon | L 24-48 | — | 7 | 98 | 12.8 | 14 | 0 | 37 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs California | W 62-14 | — | 7 | 99 | 14.1 | 14.10 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Stanford100 receiving yards · High volume | L 23-27 | — | 8 | 100 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Sun 11/4 | vs Arizona State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 36-26 | — | 4 | 108 | 23.6 | 27 | 2 | 50 |
| Sun 10/28 | @ Washington | L 17-20 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 10/21 | vs Utah | W 21-7 | — | 7 | 90 | 10.2 | 12.90 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ BYU2+ TD | W 42-24 | — | 5 | 66 | 13 | 13.20 | 2 | 24 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Washington StateHigh volume | W 19-6 | — | 9 | 95 | 9.5 | 10.60 | 1 | 22 |
| Sun 9/30 | @ Arizona100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-35 | — | 10 | 166 | 14 | 16.60 | 2 | 51 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ UCLA100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-20 | — | 9 | 150 | 16 | 16.70 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs WisconsinHigh volume | W 10-7 | — | 8 | 87 | 9 | 10.90 | 0 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon State
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920092010201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Oregon State | 89 | 62.8 | 6.3 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oregon State | 89 | 62.8 | 6.3 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Oregon State | 675 | 79.7 | 25.5 | 586 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Oregon State | 986 | 84.1 | 22.8 | 311 |
| 2012 Postseason | Oregon State | 1,244 | 86.3 | 29 | 258 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Oregon State | 1,244 | 86.3 | 29 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
166
Primary metric
166 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oregon
137
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 91.3 efficiency score.
#3
UCLA
150
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
150 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Washington
125
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
108
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Oregon State
1,244 primary output · 86.3 efficiency · 29 usage
71.9
#2
2012 Regular Season · Oregon State
71.9
1,244 primary · 86.3 efficiency · 29 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Oregon State
64.6
986 primary · 84.1 efficiency · 22.8 usage
Milestones
11
100+ receiving yards
10
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.75
St. Augustine Prep · Richland, NJ
- Committed To
- Eastern Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,994
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.