Usage Score
29.1
Player Dossier
2009-2013Rice
RB • 6'1" • Schertz, TX, USA
Charles Ross leans workhorse runner traits and 60.5 efficiency.
Usage Score
29.1
Efficiency
60.5
Consistency
68.5
Season Value
64.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Rice
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Charles Ross, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Rice. Charles Ross leans workhorse runner traits and 60.5 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Rice paired 1,317 primary output with 60.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 60.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
109.8
Efficiency
60.5
Usage
29.1
Consistency
68.5
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 28. Texas A&M: 131. Kansas: 156. Houston: 69. UTSA: 59. New Mexico State: 167. UTEP: 152. North Texas: 101. Louisiana Tech: 215. UAB: 50. Tulane: 80. Marshall: 109
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 10 by 29.2. Texas A&M: 21 by 61.2. Kansas: 29 by 58.8. Houston: 10 by 66.9. UTSA: 11 by 55.9. New Mexico State: 26 by 66.9. UTEP: 21 by 75.4. North Texas: 18 by 58.4. Louisiana Tech: 27 by 82.9. UAB: 10 by 52.1. Tulane: 15 by 55.6. Marshall: 18 by 63.1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
82.9 vs Louisiana Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/31 | @ Mississippi State | L 7-44 | 10 | 28 | 2.80 | 1 | — | — | 2.8 |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Marshall100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 41-24 | 18 | 109 | 6.10 | 2 | — | — | 6.1 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Tulane | W 17-13 | 15 | 80 | 5.30 | 0 | — | — | 5.3 |
| Fri 11/22 | @ UAB | W 37-34 | 10 | 50 | 5 | 1 | — | — | 5 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs Louisiana Tech100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 52-14 | 27 | 215 | 8 | 5 | — | — | 8.0 |
| Thu 10/31 | @ North Texas100 rush yards | L 16-28 | 18 | 101 | 5.60 | 0 | — | — | 5.6 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs UTEP100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 45-7 | 21 | 152 | 7.20 | 1 | — | — | 7.2 |
| Sun 10/20 | @ New Mexico State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 45-19 | 26 | 167 | 6.40 | 1 | — | — | 6.4 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ UTSA | W 27-21 | 11 | 59 | 5.40 | 0 | — | — | 5.4 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Houston | L 26-31 | 9 | 55 | 6.10 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 6.9 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Kansas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 23-14 | 27 | 157 | 5.80 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 5.4 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Texas A&M100 rush yards · 2+ TD | L 31-52 | 19 | 107 | 5.60 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 6.2 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Rice | 621 | 51.5 | 17.9 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Rice | 68 | 30.3 | 3.8 | -553 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rice | 99 | 52.7 | 7 | 31 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rice | 898 | 48.2 | 18.1 | 799 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rice | 898 | 48.2 | 18.1 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Rice | 1,317 | 60.5 | 29.1 | 419 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 1,317 | 60.5 | 29.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Louisiana Tech
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
215
Primary metric
215 scrimmage yards and 33.3 usage.
#2
Houston
135
Primary metric
Loss with 135 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
135 scrimmage yards and 22.6 usage.
#3
UTEP
154
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
154 scrimmage yards and 30.3 usage.
#4
Northwestern
31
Primary metric
Loss with 31 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
31 scrimmage yards and 5.7 usage.
#5
Louisiana Tech
134
Primary metric
Loss with 134 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
134 scrimmage yards and 20.3 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Rice
1,317 primary output · 60.5 efficiency · 29.1 usage
64.5
#2
2013 Regular Season · Rice
64.5
1,317 primary · 60.5 efficiency · 29.1 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Rice
47.7
898 primary · 48.2 efficiency · 18.1 usage
13
100+ rush yards
5
150+ scrimmage yards
7
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8289
Samuel Clemens · Schertz, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,003
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 51 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Charles Ross quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit