Usage Score
2.2
Player Dossier
2009-2010Memphis
Randy Powell
RB • 6'0" • Memphis, TN, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Randy Powell leans balanced backfield option traits and 36.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
36.5
Consistency
50
Season Value
44
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Memphis
0910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Randy Powell, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Memphis. Randy Powell leans balanced backfield option traits and 36.5 efficiency.
Randy Powell played RB for Memphis. Across 2 tracked seasons, Randy Powell recorded 7 rushing yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Memphis.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Memphis paired 7 primary output with 36.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 36.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with 7 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Memphis
Games
2
Scrimmage Yards / G
3.5
Efficiency
36.5
Usage
2.2
Consistency
50
Best Game by takeover score
Louisville
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 7. Louisville: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses3.5 · Games = 2
All Games3.5 · Games = 2
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
72.9 vs Tulsa
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Memphis | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Memphis | 7 | 36.5 | 2.2 | 7 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with 7 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
7
Primary metric
7 scrimmage yards and 2.3 usage.
#2
Louisville
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
0 scrimmage yards and 2 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Memphis
7 primary output · 36.5 efficiency · 2.2 usage
44
#2
2009 Regular Season · Memphis
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8344
Kingsbury · Memphis, TN
- Committed To
- Memphis
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
7
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 2 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.