Usage / Role
0%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2010Houston
TE • 6'4" • USA
Tyler Chambers reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
0%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
8
Developing production for a tight end
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
20
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Houston
Snapshot
Tyler Chambers, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Houston. Tyler Chambers reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Houston | 4 | - | 0 | 0 | 41.3 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Houston | 4 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 41.3 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
Related Context
Tyler Chambers played TE for Houston. Across 2 tracked seasons, Tyler Chambers recorded 7 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Houston.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Houston paired 7 primary output with 46.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 46.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
1.8
Efficiency
46.7
Usage
3
Consistency
8.3
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 0. Tulane: 7. Tulsa: 0. Rice: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Tulane
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Houston
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Houston | 7 | 46.7 | 3 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Houston | 7 | 46.7 | 3 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | -7 |
#1 Featured game
@ Tulane
Week 7 · W 44-16 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
7
Receiving Yards
52.2 takeover
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#2
@ Air Force
Week 1 · L 20-47 · Postseason
0
Receiving Yards
— takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#3
vs Rice
Week 13 · W 73-14 · Conference game
0
Receiving Yards
— takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
@ Tulsa
Week 10 · W 46-45 · Conference game
0
Receiving Yards
— takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Houston
7 primary output · 46.7 efficiency · 3 usage
41.3
#2
2009 Regular Season · Houston
41.3
7 primary · 46.7 efficiency · 3 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Houston
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.