Usage Score
6
Player Dossier
2009-2013Wisconsin
TE • 6'4" • Loveland, OH, USA
Brian Wozniak reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
6
Efficiency
38
Consistency
80.3
Season Value
39.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Wisconsin
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brian Wozniak, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Wisconsin. Brian Wozniak reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Wisconsin paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 38 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
6.6
Efficiency
38
Usage
6
Consistency
80.3
Best Game by takeover score
South Carolina
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Carolina: 7. Unknown: 6. Illinois: 2. Minnesota: 9. Penn State: 9
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Carolina: 1 by 46.7. Unknown: 1 by 40. Illinois: 1 by 13.3. Minnesota: 1 by 60. Penn State: 2 by 30
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Minnesota
Best efficiency game
60 vs Minnesota
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wisconsin
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 94 | 54.3 | 12.2 | 94 |
| 2013 Postseason | Wisconsin | 33 | 38 | 6 | -61 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 33 | 38 | 6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40
Primary metric
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah State
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
Minnesota
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#4
Penn State
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 30 efficiency score.
#5
South Carolina
7
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
7 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Wisconsin
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2011 Regular Season · Wisconsin
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Wisconsin
49.1
94 primary · 54.3 efficiency · 12.2 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9678
Ramsay · Birmingham, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
127
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brian Wozniak quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit