Usage Score
21.1
Player Dossier
2009-2012Purdue
Antavian Edison
WR • 5'11" • Fort Meyers, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Antavian Edison reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
71.8
Consistency
73.9
Season Value
65.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Purdue
091011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Antavian Edison, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Purdue. Antavian Edison reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Purdue paired 652 primary output with 71.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Purdue
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
54.3
Efficiency
71.8
Usage
21.1
Consistency
73.9
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 27. Unknown: 58. Notre Dame: 50. Eastern Michigan: 78. Marshall: 99. Michigan: 28. Wisconsin: 58. Ohio State: 10. Minnesota: 51. Penn State: 93. Iowa: 50. Indiana: 50
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 1 by 100. Unknown: 7 by 55.2. Notre Dame: 6 by 55.6. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 100. Marshall: 6 by 100. Michigan: 4 by 46.7. Wisconsin: 3 by 100. Ohio State: 2 by 33.3. Minnesota: 5 by 68. Penn State: 9 by 68.9. Iowa: 5 by 66.7. Indiana: 5 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Wins69.3 · n=4 · +24.0 vs Losses
Losses45.3 · n=7 · -24.0 vs Wins
First Half56.7 · n=6 · +4.7 vs Second Half
Second Half52 · n=6 · -4.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | @ Oklahoma State | L 14-58 | — | 1 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Indiana | W 56-35 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Iowa | W 27-24 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Penn StateHigh volume | L 9-34 | — | 9 | 93 | 9.7 | 10.30 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Minnesota | L 28-44 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Ohio State | L 22-29 | — | 2 | 10 | 2.8 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Wisconsin | L 14-38 | — | 3 | 58 | 16.3 | 19.30 | 0 | 52 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Michigan | L 13-44 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Marshall | W 51-41 | — | 6 | 99 | 12.1 | 16.50 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 54-16 | — | 5 | 78 | 13.8 | 15.60 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Notre Dame2+ TD | L 17-20 | — | 6 | 50 | 6.4 | 8.30 | 2 | 15 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 58 | 6.6 | 8.30 | 1 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Purdue | 15 | 100 | 5.9 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Purdue | 316 | 53 | 21.9 | 301 |
| 2011 Postseason | Purdue | 584 | 77.5 | 18.9 | 268 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 584 | 77.5 | 18.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Purdue | 652 | 71.8 | 21.1 | 68 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Purdue | 652 | 71.8 | 21.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Indiana
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
99
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa
97
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 71.9 efficiency score.
#5
Toledo
15
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Purdue
652 primary output · 71.8 efficiency · 21.1 usage
65.3
#2
2012 Regular Season · Purdue
65.3
652 primary · 71.8 efficiency · 21.1 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Purdue
59.5
584 primary · 77.5 efficiency · 18.9 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7733
Dunbar · Fort Myers, FL
- Committed To
- Purdue
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,567
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.