Usage Score
9.3
Player Dossier
2009-2013Purdue
WR • 6'0" • Miami, FL, USA
Gary Bush reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.3
Efficiency
38.3
Consistency
55.8
Season Value
29.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Purdue
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Gary Bush, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Purdue. Gary Bush reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Purdue paired 360 primary output with 58 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 38.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
9.5
Efficiency
38.3
Usage
9.3
Consistency
55.8
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 14. Wisconsin: 19. Ohio State: 18. Penn State: 2. Illinois: -1. Indiana: 5
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 4 by 23.3. Wisconsin: 1 by 100. Ohio State: 2 by 60. Penn State: 1 by 13.3. Illinois: 1 by 0. Indiana: 1 by 33.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Purdue | 95 | 47.8 | 10.6 | 95 |
| 2011 Postseason | Purdue | 310 | 56.1 | 13.4 | 215 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Purdue | 310 | 56.1 | 13.4 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Purdue | 360 | 58 | 15.1 | 50 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Purdue | 57 | 38.3 | 9.3 | -303 |
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90
Primary metric
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Michigan
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wisconsin
19
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Marshall
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 79 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Purdue
360 primary output · 58 efficiency · 15.1 usage
56.6
#2
2011 Postseason · Purdue
48.6
310 primary · 56.1 efficiency · 13.4 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Purdue
48.6
310 primary · 56.1 efficiency · 13.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.85
Columbus · Miami, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
822
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Gary Bush quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit